Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Shame really. Though Dixon was pretty decent actually. I'd love the BBC to have a proper reshuffle. I want to see people with contrasting views, not people who take it in turns to agree with one another. It's like when that cunt Andy Gray used to bang on about zonal marking, not once did I ever hear anyone ask him, 'well why is it played? What are it's advantages?' The pundits in this country are so ****ing lazy it's unreal. Lazy opinions. Lazy research. **** me, being a pundit for the bbc must be one of the easiest jobs in the country.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment