Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Of course, we went for Sigurdsen first, but that appeared to be due to his imminent move to Swansea. He had agreed that move with them and just had sign the dotted line on the contract. There was no time to hang about with him.
One thing which was telling imo was that we did not bow to his demands when Spurs came in. We were happy to let him go. However, we did appear to increase the bid for Allen from £12m to £15 in order to land him. You could argue that the club wanted Allen more than Sigurdsen.
In short, we haven't got a clue.
Or we were getting desperate after failing to land our first target
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
It's an utter embarrassment we weren't able to sign him though!
Not sure if that's the case.
He openly said that he wants to stay even he would only play for Barca B.
I think we tried but if the player is unwilling not sure we could do anything in the end.
That said, what I do have a problem with with that we could have gone for another youngster Deulofeu after we found out that Tello loan attempt failed.
That kid can play and he could make an impact for us right now.
Comment