Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
I have no idea what kind of morons the BBC are employing but if anyone is looking for a job then so long as you can use a computer, have the gift of sight, and have not had a lobotomy chuck your CV over and you'll be better than the person that compiled this
Number is what BBC claim is difference, number is brackets is actual difference
Arsenal 0 (+1)
Tottenham -1 (0)
Liverpool - 1 (-3)
Norwich +8 (+9)
Southampton +3 (+2)
West Ham +1 (0)
Fulham 0 (+1)
Aston Villa +1 (+2)
Crystal Palace +1 (+2)
Cardiff -7 (-5)
Hull +3 (-2) This one is particularly stupid because if indeed Hull were 3 places higher as a result of Lawro's predictions than they were in reality then Hull would be top of the ****ing championship
Swansea -1 (-6)
10 errors out of 20 teams. And before anyone wonders to possible reasons why they could be so wrong it isn't a game taking place after it was published. This was published on Thursday.
I have no idea what kind of morons the BBC are employing but if anyone is looking for a job then so long as you can use a computer, have the gift of sight, and have not had a lobotomy chuck your CV over and you'll be better than the person that compiled this
Number is what BBC claim is difference, number is brackets is actual difference
Arsenal 0 (+1)
Tottenham -1 (0)
Liverpool - 1 (-3)
Norwich +8 (+9)
Southampton +3 (+2)
West Ham +1 (0)
Fulham 0 (+1)
Aston Villa +1 (+2)
Crystal Palace +1 (+2)
Cardiff -7 (-5)
Hull +3 (-2) This one is particularly stupid because if indeed Hull were 3 places higher as a result of Lawro's predictions than they were in reality then Hull would be top of the ****ing championship
Swansea -1 (-6)
10 errors out of 20 teams. And before anyone wonders to possible reasons why they could be so wrong it isn't a game taking place after it was published. This was published on Thursday.
Um, isn't this the table based on Lawro's predictions?
Yes. And the arrow at the end of the colum donates the difference between his prediction table and the real table. That is recorded incorrectly 10 times.
His predictions put Arsenal top, which the table claims matches reality.
The predictions put Liverpool 4th, which the table claims is 1 place lower than reality.
...so the claims for LFC and Arsenal were right before our game against Swansea on Monday. Perhaps they just used an old version of the table, after Saturday's matches perhaps.
Chester, it would be fantastic if you would compare the discrepancies in their figures with the table as it stood before last Sunday's matches. If it doesn't fit then at least we can lay this theory to rest and pour our energies into developing new hypotheses.
I'm sure we'll get to the bottom of it all eventually.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
as it stood before last Sunday's matches. If it doesn't fit then at least we can lay this theory to rest and pour our energies into developing new hypotheses.
Cardiff, West Ham, and Southampton are the only teams than would be affected. WH and Southampton on account of the 0-0 draw, Cardiff the only non-participant team that would change places.
Comment