Transfers (General)

[dom9]

They bought him from Barca.

Makes sense in every other way. But £50m+ for a 28 year old with one year left on his contract

I can only see City paying that.

And yet he scores goals. I'd say that's cheap and better value than some of the relatively unproven players we're getting in, or the £150m for Coutinho.

You'd get at least 3 good years out of him if he stays clear of injuries and circa 60+ goals if he's in the right team.

[Buzzo]

Oops! Didn't realise he had already played there.

They bought him from Barca.

Makes sense in every other way. But £50m+ for a 28 year old with one year left on his contract

I can only see City paying that.

[dom9]

Maybe he doesn't want to go back to Barca though?

Once bitten twice shy.

Oops! Didn't realise he had already played there.

[Buzzo]

Maybe he doesn't want to go back to Barca though?

Once bitten twice shy.

[dom9]

I think it's hilarious. Sell for a price seen as cheap by the fans and it's further carnage. Don't get the fee or swap deal they want and they're stuck with a very pissed off Sanchez for six months to a year and they get **** all cash for him. Love it

You'd think he would be a more cost effective option for Barca than Coutinho.

Different players, I know, but if you're looking to replace Neymar, then Sanchez to Barca is more logical to me.

[Kenneth]

I think it's hilarious. Sell for a price seen as cheap by the fans and it's further carnage. Don't get the fee or swap deal they want and they're stuck with a very pissed off Sanchez for six months to a year and they get **** all cash for him. Love it

[Robbie-9-Fowler]

Algerian journo claiming Mahrez will make a surprise move tomorrow.

Man United maybe?

I think so, they wanted a wide player earlier in the window.

What does everyone think of Arsenal's stance over Sanchez? Rejected £50m from City, if they are serious about not selling how can they justify it?

Would you pay £50m to loan him for a year? Because what they are doing has similarities to a club doing as much.

[Shaggy]

[ame]https://twitter.com/MiguelDelaney/status/902823201515896832[/ame]

[RedReet]

Chelsea bidding for a load of players who are no more than decent then? Great stuff.

I was thinking the same, but then I remembered how we laughed last year when they signed the likes of Alonso and Luiz. There are similarities to Klopp, he doesn't need to go out and buy the best player in every position ( Pep), just get the right players for his style.

That being said, I still wouldn't be too chuffed if I was a Chelsea fan.

[Fosterbloke]

maybe arse to replace sanchez

Nah, he wants CL football, I hope he gets his move to Roma.

[baitman]

Algerian journo claiming Mahrez will make a surprise move tomorrow.

Man United maybe?

maybe arse to replace sanchez

[ChesterDave]

Algerian journo claiming Mahrez will make a surprise move tomorrow.

Man United maybe?

Gainsborough Trinity

[Shaggy]

Algerian journo claiming Mahrez will make a surprise move tomorrow.

Man United maybe?

[Liverpool]

not really an English quota, squad of 25 players, max 17 foreign so 8 homegrown, cesc and moses count as HG. They essentially can only buy 1 or 2 more foreign players and unlimited number of under 21's

[Abro100]

Talk about them being 3 homegrown players short of the leagues required quota, hence them bidding for Ox, Barkley and Drinkwater. Either sign players or promote youth and this is Chelsea after all

It's a pitty they didn't sign solanke or loftus cheek oh......

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk