VAR thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fidget
    Paisley
    • Nov 2010
    • 11705

    #1

    VAR thread

    I know Bob's a big fan but I'm not so sure.
    Slows the game down and makes it all feel a bit odd.
    Thoughts?
    Glass Half Full
  • Kenneth
    Pond Scum
    • May 2007
    • 65636

    #2
    It will get more efficient as time goes by. I think it's OK. I'm glad snide fouls like the pull on Salah are going to get picked up.
    Last edited by Kenneth; 27-01-18, 08:43 PM.
    Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

    Comment

    • Buzzo
      Donald Buzzworth
      • Jun 2010
      • 67435

      #3
      It definitely needs to be used more efficiently, and maybe a 'time off' aspect like in Rugby, but it will work.
      Modifying post.

      Comment

      • McDermotX
        Paisley
        • Aug 2006
        • 35360

        #4
        I enjoy all the rigmarole around it to be fair.......players wanting to bundle over to look at the screen, arguing things right in front of their face, refs taking an age while looking at the screen despite it being obvious, players calling for every little incident to be questioned, more than a couple West Brom players lording it to the ref after Bobby missed the peno etc etc
        "I will make the boys feel your support"
        Jurgen Klopp June 2020

        Comment

        • baitman
          Dad's Cabs
          • Sep 2011
          • 27740

          #5
          motm today
          removing all the weak links makes us stronger

          too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

          Comment

          • Exiled_red
            Paisley
            • Nov 2007
            • 55269

            #6
            I think they need to be clearer about it's use and what is going on and when it is to be used, I know that the VAR got all the decisions right yesterday so I suppose it was justified but there seemed to be a lot of decisions referred, did the referee really miss all those or was it a lack of confidence in his ability or a desire to get things right or what?

            It seems like they still want the referees to make the decision hence why the referee has to go over to the tunnel (or whatever) to watch it on the TV. What happens if the tunnel is at the far end of the ground rather than on the halfway line, that would take even longer to sort out. Surely he should be told the decision to make over the microphone.

            I also feel that the players and the fans need to have a better idea what is going on
            The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

            Comment

            • rodo
              Shankly
              • Aug 2006
              • 9708

              #7
              ****e at the actual match as you have no idea what they are looking at
              Oh I say his vision there was lovely

              Comment

              • Barnie7
                Houllier
                • Aug 2006
                • 485

                #8
                Is the same in Germany, it’s so frustrating.

                We had a situation recently between Freiburg vs Hertha (i think) , where there was a Foul in the penalty area but the ref waved play on...over a Minute later he stopped the game & gave the penalty...everybody was shocked & frustrated that it took so long.

                Comment

                • Red_Polo
                  Takin' Her Easy
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 35520

                  #9
                  Originally posted by rodo
                  ****e at the actual match as you have no idea what they are looking at


                  This was completely predictable. It only works well if fans are keyed into what's going on. If you get to watch the same angles, and hear the decision making process it works a million times better, which is why it works in rugby.
                  Like blood on iron

                  Comment

                  • Exiled_red
                    Paisley
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 55269

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Red_Polo


                    This was completely predictable. It only works well if fans are keyed into what's going on. If you get to watch the same angles, and hear the decision making process it works a million times better, which is why it works in rugby.
                    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                    Comment

                    • Buzzo
                      Donald Buzzworth
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 67435

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Red_Polo


                      This was completely predictable. It only works well if fans are keyed into what's going on. If you get to watch the same angles, and hear the decision making process it works a million times better, which is why it works in rugby.
                      Modifying post.

                      Comment

                      • Yozza
                        Paisley
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 10247

                        #12
                        I hated the players getting involved indicating that the ref should be looking at the VAR

                        I've heard it's a yellow card offence for players to do that - Ref's need to be stronger about it...
                        What do you mean it could've been anyone? Name me one person who's got a grudge against penguins

                        Batman

                        F*** off!!!

                        Comment

                        • RedReet
                          Fantasy Football Champion
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 25265

                          #13
                          Originally posted by McDermotX
                          I enjoy all the rigmarole around it to be fair.......players wanting to bundle over to look at the screen, arguing things right in front of their face, refs taking an age while looking at the screen despite it being obvious, players calling for every little incident to be questioned, more than a couple West Brom players lording it to the ref after Bobby missed the peno etc etc



                          I thought it was quite exciting.

                          People say it breaks the game up, but there is more tension and excitement in those few mins than there is watching us pass the ball about in midfield while the opposition sits back and lets us.

                          I also didn't really see what the big difference is between the ref consulting VAR, than a decision being given and players arguing with the ref for 5 mins about it or forcing him to go speak to the linesman.
                          If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                          Comment

                          • Chris
                            Typing Tourettes is a thing
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 20697

                            #14
                            I like it and anything that lowers the chances of us getting ****ed over by refs every week is brilliant, especially given it's a yearly occurrence at places like Old Trafford so I'd like it in the league. Any teething problems will hopefully be ironed out.

                            I'm very, very surprised Utd aren't fighting this actually, going to have an enormous impact on their yearly points totals if implemented correctly in the future.

                            Comment

                            • Daniel 7
                              Heretic
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 24088

                              #15
                              My main criticism of it is in relaying it to the crowd at the game itself. I was at the WBA game and we didn't really know what was going on right up at the top of the main stand. There has to be some means of communicating it to fans, be it via tannoy or on the screens / scoreboards.

                              The other oddness was the amount of time added to the game for stopping and looking at VAR, which didn't seem to be adequately added at the end of each half. I think there were 4 minutes at the end of the first half on Saturday, which seemed way too short for the amount of normal stoppages plus VAR.

                              Comment

                              Working...