Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
City one was a blatant leg stretched across the runner combined with a hold of the shirt. The dive part is irrelevant to whether it was a foul or not, and it clearly was.
Are you secretly a City fan?? What a load of ****
"When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah
"looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey
Yeah, everyone initially saw the dive in real-time, be replays showed he dived and that he was fouled as well, hence the penalty decision.
Yep for sure but replays have shown a lot of decisions which could go the other way but have not been ‘clear and obvious’ enough for another look. If you are asking the ref to take a closer look at the Xhaka foul , then why not the Odegaard one? It’s absolutely absurd and, again, my phrase of the moment …pot luck.
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.
Comment