Do these journalists actually watch the games...?

[The Red Cardinal]

Quotes from today's Sunday Times review of the match:

"The surprise was that it took 34 minutes for Bellamy to score. Crouch had stolen the ball from Gavin Mahon, and then prodded it past Malky Mackay before shooting. From the rebound off goalkeeper Ben Foster, Bellamy was close at hand to notch his sixth Premiership goal."

Wasn't there a quite important intervention by Steve Finnan somewhere?

And:

"Just seconds later, Liverpool were two up. A long clearance was headed on by Kuyt, Bellamy this time had a shot beaten down by the left hand of Foster, and a beaming Crouch finished with a simple side-footed."

Er, wasn't it a header?

I'm not part of the 'Press Anti Liverpool' campaign but surely these are basic errors???

[tomasjj]

he watched it in his local, which is ****e btw...
and just before both goals someone had to go to the toilet and blocked his view

[Shaggy]

Pathetic.

[Owen20]

Lazy Journalism :whatever:

[ronan]

yup but not uncommon.
rags always filled with mistakes
they also have 'ghost' writers.
i.e. they can only attend a certain ammount of games and have other ppl there to tell em what happened.

few weeks ago one bright spark in one of the rags,mirror i think referred to carson on a number of occaisons despite him being inelligible to play against us