at long last ('Mascherano is a Red II: The Son of the Beast)

[Shaggy]

jrd7 Quote:
Originally Posted by Quinncy
If it was possible i`d take your bet!!!

Can I suggest a compromise?

It was a rhetorical question..............

Why don't you take his bet, but with HJC being the beneficary of the stake, rather than either one of your landlords?

That was my post about 6 up from your's. You ****ing ignorant ****ers. Just read what the people you know have to say, and ignore all others.

[Mattshark]

TBH only his passing has been below par. His ability to win the ball and retain possesion has been awesome. He's definitely outshone everyone else in the league in that regard.

I was checking out some match stats on eurosport and in a few of the games he had 10 succesful tackles. WAY ahead of anyone else in the team.

Xabi's passing is still the best in the prem however.

[kurtangle01]

jrd7 Quote:
Originally Posted by Quinncy
If it was possible i`d take your bet!!!

Can I suggest a compromise?

It was a rhetorical question..............

Why don't you take his bet, but with HJC being the beneficary of the stake, rather than either one of your landlords?

That was my post about 6 up from your's. You ****ing ignorant ****ers. Just read what the people you know have to say, and ignore all others.

Ooops. Sorry!!

[Shaggy]

You ****ing ignorant ****er!!!!!!!!!!

[Mattshark]

Ooops. Sorry!!

CHANGE YOUR SIG!!!

[kurtangle01]

You ****ing ignorant ****er!!!!!!!!!!

[jrd7]

I'm claiming that as a reply

Now you ****ers are in trouble. Maybe next week I can build up to an opinion on the game of "association football", that only the members (and there are plenty) with high numbers of posts seem to really understand

I'm very old school Koptalk (Mr Red I think), but got banned and had my access to the site blocked off for disagreeing with Wallsends' answer to David Karesh, sometime 02 (ish) or thereabouts, maybe even 03.

[Mumsafan]

Wallsends' answer to David Karesh

[jrd7]

Ooops. Sorry!!

**** me, 2 in quick succession - fair play, ****ers

[lfc4ever]

**** me, 2 in quick succession - fair play, ****ers

You do know you ignorant ****er that kids read this place, well only if allowed to by Dad of course.

So less of the swearing please, ****nugget.

[REDSCOUSER]

So Mascher got #20..huh

[jrd7]

You do know you ignorant ****er that kids read this place, well only if allowed to by Dad of course.

So less of the swearing please, ****nugget.

I was continuing in the theme of my original post. If I'd written it once how much more "damage" am I doing to the children? There are lot worse things written on the internet and occasionally on this board, sometimes against our own players, so enough of the lectures, idiot

Certainly there would have been 2 less ****s (3 if you count that one) had you not bothered to reply, and by that very same principle, there would have been one less C**T.

[Mumsafan]

I was continuing in the theme of my original post. If I'd written it once how much more "damage" am I doing to the children? There are lot worse things written on the internet and on this board against our own players, so enough of the lectures, idiot

Certainly there would have been 2 less ****s (3 if you count that one) had you not bothered to reply, and by that very same principle, there would have been one less C**T.

And there was me thinking he was just jesting

[jrd7]

And there was me thinking he was just jesting

If that's so then I apologise. Honestly.

If it was a joke, I don't really get it.

What a turbulent introduction I'm having

[Mumsafan]

If that's so then I apologise, honestly.

If it was a joke, I don't really get it.

What a turbulent introduction I'm having

It's to do with a thread by TheRedDragon in the News and Feedback section


Here http://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=14371