LFC losing money last season

[Resu]

Stole this the usual place:
Underskudd for LFC
Årsregnskapet for Liverpool Football Club er på vei ut til klubbens aksjeholdere. Det er tidligere blitt nevnt at Rick Parry vil få £500.000 når klubbens overtakelse blir fullført.

Andre punkter som har kommet ut:

- Regnskapet gikk med £5.2M i underskudd, først og fremst grunnet utbetalinger på kjøp av Crouch, Reina og Sissoko. I dagens fotball er det som kjent få overganger som blir utbetalt i cash, men blir fordelt over flere år.

- Klubben tjente £10M indre på Champions League enn i 1995, men hentet inn mye med £4M fra FA-Cupen og £3.3M fra Supercup og VM for klubblag.

- Handelen av Dirk Kuyt ble gjennomført takket være et lån fra David Moores.

- Det totale gjeld er £45M.

- Inntekter på salg av Kirkland, Traore, Barragan, Kromkamp og Mellor var £4.5M.

Translation:
-Parry to get £ 500.000 when the americans take over.
-The club had a loss of£5,2M, mainly because of Crouch, Momo and Reina.
-Earned £10M less on CL then when we won it, but got £4M from FA-cup and £3,3M from Supercup and WCC.
-The Kuyt deal was financed with a loan from Moores
-Total debt: £45M
-Total income from selling Kirkland, Traore, Barragan, Kromkamp og Mellor was£4.5M.

[Dero]

Stole this the usual place:

-Total income from selling Kirkland, Traore, Barragan, Kromkamp og Mellor was£4.5M.

That does not sound right. I could be wrong (nothing new there) but that seems low.

[Chris]

I think it sounds about right to be honest, Kirkland is ****ing **** and a crock, Traore is an ok Prem player, Barragan was cheap but then we have a cheap buy back clause (Dunno if we waived it as part of the Arbeloa deal though), Kromkamp is a decent player and Mellor has two ****ed knees

[nobbylad]

Interesting that Kuyt was funded with the help of Moores though.

[Eth]

Interesting that Kuyt was funded with the help of Moores though.

It doesn't make sense - Moores was only interested in making himself a load of money wasn't he

[nobbylad]

It doesn't make sense - Moores was only interested in making himself a load of money wasn't he

Depends what the interest rate is on the loan

[rushscored4]

It doesn't make sense - Moores was only interested in making himself a load of money wasn't he

Depends what the interest rate is on the loan

The doubters like AA will also argue that he did it as a loan rather than a gift though...