Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seems Moores personally funded Kuyt Purchase

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Seems Moores personally funded Kuyt Purchase

    I know he's received a lot of stick, some of it rightly, and I know alun on here in particular suggested it would be a good gesture if he left Rafa a parting gift, but it seems the £10m for the Kuyt deal was personally funded by Moores himself:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/...033412,00.html

    Americans borrow £298m to buy Liverpool


    Club likely to foot annual £21.5m interest payments
    Moores family loaned £10m for new signings

    David Conn
    Wednesday March 14, 2007
    The Guardian

    Thomas O Hicks and George Gillett Jr, the two American businessmen who are close to completing their takeover of Liverpool, have borrowed almost £300m from the Royal Bank of Scotland to finance the deal. The bank has loaned the money at 1.5% above the current standard lending rate, meaning that about £21.5m interest will be payable this year.

    The debt is not being taken on by the club in the way the Glazer family loaded Manchester United with £660m borrowings from their 2005 takeover, but professionals close to the deal said it was nevertheless likely that Liverpool would pay the interest, or pay Hicks and Gillett "a big dividend" at the end of the year to enable them to do so.

    Article continues
    The terms of the loans are in the offer document sent to all shareholders, revealing that the two men are borrowing £185m to pay for the £174m takeover itself and associated costs, with another £113m available as a "revolving credit facility" to absorb Liverpool's debts and fund the club and preliminary work on the new 60,000-seat stadium. A further £200m will be borrowed to build the stadium but the way that will be done has not been worked out. The initial £298m loans are guaranteed by Hicks and Gillett personally.

    The offer document also reveals how stretched Liverpool became financially last year as the chief executive, Rick Parry, searched for someone to take over the club. In August the then chairman David Moores lent the club £10m - £2m personally and £8m from a family trust - to let the manager, Rafael Benítez, have some money to strengthen the squad, which he spent on buying the striker Dirk Kuyt.

    Parry said that with a takeover likely the club had not wanted to take on more bank finance. "We were at the limit in terms of our short-term borrowing facilities and were racking up expenditure keeping the stadium on schedule, so it was a fantastic gesture by David to make that money available." Along with the money Hicks and Gillett are paying for his shares, Moores will have his loans repaid in full.

    The takeover is certain to go through after it was confirmed last week that over 80% of Liverpool shareholders had accepted the offer of £5,000 a share. Moores, the former 51.5% shareholder, will be paid £89.615m for the 17,923 shares he bought for about £12m.

    Robert Tilliss, the New York-based financial adviser to Hicks and Gillett, said the men had been attracted by buying "one of the leading brands in the world's No1 sport". He said they would bring their sports business expertise over from the US, where $20bn (£10.3bn) has been spent in recent years upgrading stadiums whose ticket prices make those in the Premiership seem like a snip. Tilliss said the popularity of English football in Asia had also been a factor. "All clubs in the US continue to drive on international, national and local revenues, and the great brands of English football certainly have room to develop."

    Hicks and Gillett, who have said they intend to be "custodians" and hold Liverpool as a family asset, will own the club via a company structure based in the tax havens of the Cayman Islands and the US state of Delaware. The ultimate holding company, Kop Investment LLC, is registered in Delaware, which has low corporation tax and no capital gains tax, and its principal office is at Hicks's corporate headquarters in Dallas, Texas. One professional involved with the deal said that this did not mean the two men foresaw a sale or flotation and were "sheltering" those future gains from tax, but that it was simply "a tax efficient" way to structure the deal.
    White liquid in a bottle = Milk

    Purslow = C*nt

    #2
    Jesus. We really must've been ****ing skint.
    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

    Comment


      #3
      He's paid one million per goal so far for Kuyt.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by anfieldanfield View Post
        He's paid one million per goal so far for Kuyt.
        I know I shouldn't but
        Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post
          Jesus. We really must've been ****ing skint.
          They must have been under immense pressure to back Rafa and find investment.
          White liquid in a bottle = Milk

          Purslow = C*nt

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
            They must have been under immense pressure to back Rafa and find investment.

            Makes you wonder doesn't it?
            Babel fanclub member # 4!!!

            **** OFF MOURINHO!!!!!!:whatever:

            Comment


              #7
              Thomas O Hicks and George Gillett Jr, the two American businessmen who are close to completing their takeover of Liverpool, have borrowed almost £300m from the Royal Bank of Scotland to finance the deal. The bank has loaned the money at 1.5% above the current standard lending rate, meaning that about £21.5m interest will be payable this year.
              The debt is not being taken on by the club in the way the Glazer family loaded Manchester United with £660m borrowings from their 2005 takeover, but professionals close to the deal said it was nevertheless likely that Liverpool would pay the interest, or pay Hicks and Gillett "a big dividend" at the end of the year to enable them to do so.


              I don't like the sound of this 21 million in interest bollocks. Will this be an annual payment that needs to be made? If it is then how the **** are we going to afford that?
              Babel fanclub member # 4!!!

              **** OFF MOURINHO!!!!!!:whatever:

              Comment


                #8
                Morgan has been very sheepish, and is noted for his absence, in all this.
                http://www.retroreds.co.uk/

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by kurtangle01 View Post
                  Thomas O Hicks and George Gillett Jr, the two American businessmen who are close to completing their takeover of Liverpool, have borrowed almost £300m from the Royal Bank of Scotland to finance the deal. The bank has loaned the money at 1.5% above the current standard lending rate, meaning that about £21.5m interest will be payable this year.
                  The debt is not being taken on by the club in the way the Glazer family loaded Manchester United with £660m borrowings from their 2005 takeover, but professionals close to the deal said it was nevertheless likely that Liverpool would pay the interest, or pay Hicks and Gillett "a big dividend" at the end of the year to enable them to do so.


                  I don't like the sound of this 21 million in interest bollocks. Will this be an annual payment that needs to be made? If it is then how the **** are we going to afford that?

                  Sounds like bolleaux to me.
                  Hicks and Gillette are not in this to make money in the short-term, they'll pay the interest.
                  Originally posted by Gordon Brown
                  (1995)
                  "A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Red Chilli View Post
                    Sounds like bolleaux to me.
                    Hicks and Gillette are not in this to make money in the short-term, they'll pay the interest.
                    Well the article suggest that if the club makes any profit they'll give themselves the dividends in order to pay the interest. That may or may not be the case, the reporter is obviously speculating.

                    Either way I have no doubt that long-term profitability is their aim, which is no bad thing really if it makes the club self-sufficient.

                    I'd be extremely surprised if they personally guaranteed the loans themselves as opposed to using the guarantee of some parent company in some kind of corporate structure. If they have personally guaranteed the loan however then they must be very serious about making the club self-financing.
                    White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                    Purslow = C*nt

                    Comment


                      #11
                      A lot of people are going to be very red faced when they find out that Moores paid for Kuyt out of his own pocket!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        i wonder if he makes kuyt clean his house on his days off? i reckon he's been ripped off!!

                        i could have got 200 immigrants for 10 million, clean shoes for life

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by kurtangle01 View Post
                          Thomas O Hicks and George Gillett Jr, the two American businessmen who are close to completing their takeover of Liverpool, have borrowed almost £300m from the Royal Bank of Scotland to finance the deal. The bank has loaned the money at 1.5% above the current standard lending rate, meaning that about £21.5m interest will be payable this year.
                          The debt is not being taken on by the club in the way the Glazer family loaded Manchester United with £660m borrowings from their 2005 takeover, but professionals close to the deal said it was nevertheless likely that Liverpool would pay the interest, or pay Hicks and Gillett "a big dividend" at the end of the year to enable them to do so.


                          I don't like the sound of this 21 million in interest bollocks. Will this be an annual payment that needs to be made? If it is then how the **** are we going to afford that?
                          Don't think it's anything to worry about, unless you're an oligarch, when you buy a house you take out a mortgage.

                          On a loan of £300m, the assumption is they are paying interest of 7% per annum, which amounts to £21m.

                          It's normal business practice. Unlike the scum though, it is Gillett and Hicks who owe the money, not the club. I'm sure when they purchased LFC they projected growth well in excess of 7% a year.
                          "The definition of insanity is not running into the same wall again and again; it's expecting a different result every time you do it."

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Its all just numbers - LFC will always be an attractive investment so I don't worry about debt - sure haven't we just sold the club while in debt!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Would explain why he seems he can never be dropped to give Robbie a chance.
                              Life is NOT a journey to the grave with the goal of arriving safely in a prettily preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways in a shower of gravel and party shards, thoroughly used, utterly exhausted, and loudly proclaiming: "F*** ME, that was BRILLIANT!"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X