Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kop's fervour inspires Liverpool

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Kop's fervour inspires Liverpool



    Kop's fervour inspires Liverpool

    By Tim Rich

    Last Updated: 1:09am BST 13/04/2007

    If there is one near-certainty when Chelsea and Liverpool meet in the Champions League for the third successive season, it is that it will not be a fixture stuffed with goals.

    In six hours of European football, the two teams have produced just the one - Luis Garcia's "ghost goal" at Anfield that has never been formally accepted by Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho. This is a match that is likely to be won by small degrees.

    Mourinho has another name for Garcia's goal that deprived him of the honour of managing two different clubs in successive European Cup finals - "the crowd's goal" he called it, and with justice.

    If there is one advantage Liverpool hold it is that the second leg - as in 2005 - will be played at Anfield. "You can use the memories of two years ago as motivation," Liverpool midfielder Xabi Alonso said. "But our squad and theirs have changed a lot since then. There will be a lot of new players who weren't involved in those games.

    "But what will be the same is the passion and the commitment of both teams, and of our supporters. It will be a big factor. We felt the power of the Anfield crowd two years ago, and again against Barcelona this season. There is no doubt this is a big advantage for us. I am not sure what effect the crowd will have on them, but I do know it makes a big difference to us."

    The importance of a crowd can often be overstated. Before Manchester United kicked off against Roma on Tuesday night, the public address announcer attempted to whip Old Trafford into the same frenzy that had gripped the Olympic Stadium in the first leg. It sounded rather fake and plastic. What actually inspired the Stretford End and reduced Roma to an incoherent mess was the jaw-dropping quality of United's football, of a kind that no other English club could have produced.

    Whether it is the people who fill the stands or the design of the stadium, there is something unique about the sound of Anfield at full voice - and it is something that, however hard the designers try, will be lost when Liverpool quit the ground. The Roker Roar never transferred to Sunderland's Stadium of Light.

    From the moment Bill Shankly paraded the FA Cup to the Kop minutes before they kicked off their European Cup semi-final with Inter Milan in May 1965, the crowd is something Liverpool managers have known how to exploit.

    Those who were there, including an 11-year-old Phil Thompson, thought the ground vibrated, just as it seemed to against Chelsea 40 years later. Both Inter and Chelsea conceded after four minutes - and nobody disputed Roger Hunt's volley. Liverpool won 3-1, but did not make the 1965 final; for reasons Shankly was loath to admit, they could not handle the atmosphere of the San Siro in the second leg.

    The quarter-final with St Etienne in 1977, when Liverpool scrambled two late goals to win in the last match John Toshack and Kevin Keegan played together, still sets a benchmark for noise. The emotion that accompanied Gerard Houllier's return to the touchline against Roma after recovering from heart surgery appeared at the time to be a decisive factor.

    But there are reasons on the pitch why Liverpool might feel confident of a third cup semi-final victory over Chelsea in successive years
    . So many of that 2005 squad were considered not good enough by their manager, Rafael Benitez. Now he simply has better players. Craig Bellamy, who was carried off with a knee ligament injury against PSV Eindhoven on Wednesday, is likely to be back for the first leg at Stamford Bridge.
    http://www.retroreds.co.uk/

    #2
    "So many of that 2005 squad were considered not good enough by their manager, Rafael Benitez. Now he simply has better players."

    True, but Chelsea would agree that there side is better than the 2005 model also. On paper it probably is too.
    Me, I’m either planning a holiday or I’m on one.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by SB View Post
      True, but Chelsea would agree that there side is better than the 2005 model also. On paper it probably is too.
      I don't agree with that - I think the Chelsea team of 2005 was markedly better than now. Their play was much more cohesive.
      Just when I discovered the meaning of life, they changed it

      Comment


        #4
        I concur with Maestro, The 2005 chav team was more efficient, clinical and dangerous. Thats not to say these lot are a pushover but the gulf in class is much much narrower.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Maestro View Post
          I don't agree with that - I think the Chelsea team of 2005 was markedly better than now. Their play was much more cohesive.
          I agree that they were a better side back then but Maureen would point out that the signings made last summer of Ashley Cole, Michael Ballack and Andrey Shevchenko were 3 big signings that have improved there side. It's the injuries to other key players this season that has been there downfall. As I said, on paper they probably believe that this side is better than the 2005 side.

          Personally, I think that we can beat them but they will be looking for revenge. If I remember correctly, Chelsea had just been confirmed as the winners of the Premier League just days before we played them in the SF? Can anyone confirm that or have I got it wrong?
          Me, I’m either planning a holiday or I’m on one.

          Comment


            #6
            Chelsea are just a rich Wimbledon.

            Comment

            Working...
            X