Originally posted by Red_Polo
View Post
Mike - i know you agree
-
yes maybe so... but it inceases the need for the mccr***y pol IMO.
Mike - i know you agree
...
Don't take life too seriously or you'll never get out alive. -
Do I? Ok, cool, thanks for clearing that up for me BobOriginally posted by Bob View Postyes maybe so... but it inceases the need for the mccr***y pol IMO.
Mike - i know you agree
Oh, and AA should stay, but must post pictures of any hat-eating he might have to do
I could not dig, I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?Comment
-
No. No, and no again. AA is a good poster, and we should continue to allow him express his views.Just when I discovered the meaning of life, they changed itComment
-
No,I enjoy most of his posts,lets keep him."One day the people will understand."Comment
-
Ban Marky I SAY ! fECKING splitterAnybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
#****CITYComment
-
"When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah
"looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey
Comment
-
you lot are bullies!'Of course I didn't take my wife to see Rochdale as an anniversary present.
It was her birthday.
Would I have got married during the football season ?
Anyway, it was Rochdale reserves.'Comment
-
Let him stay i enjoy his posts as i d most, it was im just only said in jest.It will be a loss to lose a member like anyone on this site, we all have our opinions and its interesting discussing them with each other.When you feel like you're done, you are not alone........Comment
-
By the way, just thought I'd make clear I only meant the poll as a bit of banter, I don't want to see either bannedThomas Hicks SeniorComment
-
It's too late to backtrack now, you sh*t-stirrer.Originally posted by Morphorino View Post
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
not backtracking, I never voted
Thomas Hicks SeniorComment
-
Apathy is nothing to be proud of.Originally posted by Morphorino View Postnot backtracking, I never voted
And neither is trying to get AnfieldDanfield and Marky9 banned..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Wasn't trying to get either banned, if anyone get's banned then they banned themselves (sure i've heard that somewhere before)(also i'm not sure if you're being serious or tongue in cheek)Originally posted by Neil Young View PostThomas Hicks SeniorComment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Comment