Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
However anyone who calls themselves the Governor though needs to take a good long look at himself. Which is what NY was trying to say... i think.
Yes, that'll do.
I've just worked out that what I was actually saying is that Paul Ince was actually only a quarter of the player for us that he thought he was.
By the way, I'm making the figures up but they feel about right. Just don't ask me to prove them empirically.
I hope that's all clear.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
like others on here I had clean forgotten about him playing for us, thats how good he was eh?!
Once manc scum, always manc scum in my opinion and for that reason alone I hope he proves a huge flop at mk dons.
My attitude to Paul Ince is if that he had been half as good for us as he thought he'd have been twice as good as he was.
Er, I think.
Makes perfect sense to me
Reading a few of the books written recently,he really did believe in all this "guvner" bollox.
He seemed to to try harder in certain games when he wanted to.Someone like Roy Evans would always be facing an uphill battle with someone like that.
Bit like Collymore.
-----------------------------------------------
'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'
Comment