Erm....thanks for the info. Nice to know someone has their finger on the pulse.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official "Fernando Torres is a red" thread
Collapse
X
-
He's certainly caused a lot of excitement around here but I think it's a bit much to accuse him of being "a disruption of the ocean-atmosphere system in the Tropical Pacific having important consequences for weather and climate around the globe."Originally posted by Liverta 78 View PostGreat news! Just read on the Beeb that they call him "El Nino"..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
I have mixed feelings about this signing if it is £20 mill and not £26millOriginally posted by Liverta 78 View PostMedical passed...welcome "El Nino"
then I think it is a good deal although risky.
I think he has a lot to prove and I hope he can settle and adapt very quickly indeed.
Having said all that I am delighted that G&H have backed Rafa and have shown the rest of the EPL that we mean business.
Overall it's a positive situation.
Welcome Nando Torres.
Comment
-
Fernando Torres - your expectations
So Torres has all but signed on the dotted line. I'm buzzing but, for the first time ever with a massive signing, I'm keeping my expectations in check.
We've been stung so many times with big money buys - particularly with strikers.
- Collymore. He did well initially but it soon turned sour and ended prematurely. I genuinely thought Stanley Victor, a prodigious talent, and Robbie Fowler would form one of, if not *the* best strike force in European football.

- Diouf. Enough said. Arse hole. :whatever: Sold for a massive loss.
- Heskey. An £11m fee, great first season, sheer frustration thereafter. Failed primarily for a lack of the strong mentality needed to be a top striker. Sold for a hefty loss.
- Cisse. I hadn't seen much of him but, embarrassingly, I was very, very excited about him. He was ****, and will be sold for a huge loss.
- Morientes. Man I was excited when we signed him. I thought he'd be perfect for us.
His lack of pace, mobility, strength and speed-of-thought left him wholly exposed, for the most part, in English football. Sold for a loss.
So what do you expect of Torres? How might he join the list of striking failures?
I don't pretend to be an expert on his attributes; I've seen him play around a dozen times and he's been both brilliant and poor. He's quick, but not Cissé-quick, surprisingly strong, good technique and can finish in all manner of fashions - head, curlers into the corner, lobs, screamers. He misses chances, but all strikers do.
I'm excited - I think he'll be fantastic for us but I'm not allowing myself to get carried away. Not at all.
What hasn't he got in his locker? What makes anyone think he won't adapt?Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment
- Collymore. He did well initially but it soon turned sour and ended prematurely. I genuinely thought Stanley Victor, a prodigious talent, and Robbie Fowler would form one of, if not *the* best strike force in European football.
-
I notice you haven't included Crouch or Kuyt.
Expectations? I honestly have no idea how he'll do. The fee does bring massive pressure, then again Morientes arrived for a very reasonable sum and that didn't work out.
I hope he makes the difference but it's very rare that one player does that.I hate Polanski
Comment
-
Because neither have been failures. Well, Crouch hasn't - he's more than justified his fee and purchase - and the jury would have to be out on Kuyt. He did pretty well at times last season, and there's no way he deserves to be named in a list alongside the likes of Diouf and Cisse.Originally posted by CharlieMansonsSquint View PostI notice you haven't included Crouch or Kuyt.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment


Comment