Mascherano

[red g]

thinking about it, we'll know when we play west ham wont we?

very good point

[Morph]

We loaned him from MSI, not West Ham.

West Ham terminated all their connections to him.

stop stating things as fact mate, when you don't know at all, it's annoying

[AFII]

Sorry

I actually think that the main problem when we tried to sign him was that he had played for two clubs already last season.

[The Glove]

We had to buy his registration didnt we? Because only one club/person is allowed to do so at anyone time. Thats the problem with Tevez. We had to buy out either West Hams or that MSI blokes registrations in order to play him. We had to do similar when we bought Palleta didnt we? He wasowend by a few bods.

[AFII]

We had to buy his registration didnt we? Because only one club/person is allowed to do so at anyone time. Thats the problem with Tevez. We had to buy out either West Hams or that MSI blokes registrations in order to play him. We had to do similar when we bought Palleta didnt we? He wasowend by a few bods.

I think you are right and that is the problem with South American players. Most of them are owned together by clubs and companies/agents/relatives/whatever.

[El Jefecito]

Who gives a **** about his contract? Really? He's ace and he's ours

[red g]

why wud mash wanna leave, he is at the best club in the world

[red g]

Mascherano has also praised Liverpool manager Rafa Benitez for giving him a second chance in English football.

"I will always be grateful to Liverpool for giving me back the joy of playing. My gratitude towards them will never end," concluded Mascherano.

[mickeydocs]

Has anyone seen Mascherano's comments on the official site? Sounds like he is determined to succeed here.

http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/drilldown/N156335070710-0914.htm

[Red Chilli]

We loaned him from MSI, not West Ham.

West Ham terminated all their connections to him.

So, if we loaned him from MSI, then MSI own him.

Is that a correct assumption?

If so then that's a clear case of 3rd party ownership which I thought was against Premiership's rules.

[Charlie_B]

As long as Mascher wants to stay here beyond the loan deal I see no reason why he wouldn't sign a proper deal with us, assuming Rafa still wants him. Even if teh price is £18m, he IS worth that.

[AFII]

MSI doesn't own him this season, not even his left thumb.

[Red Chilli]

MSI doesn't own him this season, not even his left thumb.

Who does.

Warning: If you say "we do" I'm going to ask why can't we sell him.

[Red Chilli]

As long as Mascher wants to stay here beyond the loan deal I see no reason why he wouldn't sign a proper deal with us, assuming Rafa still wants him. Even if teh price is £18m, he IS worth that.

Possibly because MSI owns him and he plays where MSI wants him to play rather than where he wants to play?

[AFII]

Who does.

Warning: If you say "we do" I'm going to ask why can't we sell him.

Liverpool FC do. Maybe we can sell his left thumb for £100m to Newcastle, who knows?