Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sponsorship deal for new Anfield is worth millions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sponsorship deal for new Anfield is worth millions




    LIVERPOOL FC wants to raise £100m in a deal that will see a corporate sponsor awarded naming rights to its new stadium, it emerged last night.

    Chief executive Rick Parry confirmed the club’s American owners, Tom Hicks and George Gillett, were keen to secure a sponsorship package similar to the one Arsenal signed for its new Emirates stadium.

    It comes after Liverpool yesterday submitted a planning application for a spectacular 60,000-seater stadium which it wants to build on Stanley Park over the next three years.

    It is expected to cost around £300m and is planned to be open for the start of the 2010-11 season. The design also allows the club to increase the capacity to a potential 76,000.
    In an exclusive interview from America with the Daily Post, billionaire Mr Hicks said he expected the finance to be fully in place by the end of the planning process this autumn.

    He said the funding would involve a combination of equity and project finance, which was typical of this type of development.

    He stressed the construction was not dependent on the naming rights being sold and that the “mortgage-style” debt on the stadium would be serviced by increased revenues over a period of 25-30 years.

    “The new stadium is the single most important thing in helping Liverpool remain competitive with the Manchester Uniteds, Real Madrids and Barcelonas of the footballing world,” said Mr Hicks.

    A major part of the new ground will be the 18,000-capacity Kop end, almost half as big again as the current Kop.

    The dramatic glass and steel design allows views of the Kop from the outside to give a feel of the atmosphere inside on approach to the ground.

    “We challenged the architects to do something that would be unique to Liverpool, something that would be world class, that would encompass the Kop and something that would be recognisable to the world as Liverpool’s,” said Mr Hicks.

    A construction agent for the new stadium has not yet been announced. No-one from Laing O'Rourke, which was due to build the previous ground, and is being tipped by trade press as a front runner to take on the scheme, was available for comment yesterday.

    Speaking in Hong Kong on the club’s tour of Asia, Liverpool’s chief executive Rick Parry said the new stadium would allow the club to compete with European heavyweights in financial terms.

    Manchester United earn around £2m more per home game than Liverpool due to their larger stadium and greater corporate facilities. Liverpool hope to close that gap once they move to the new stadium.

    Mr Parry said no decision had yet been taken on naming rights but said Tom Hicks and George Gillett were keen to explore the options for a deal.

    “It’s something we will look to do or start on quickly, I would say within a matter of months,” he said. “It has to be somebody whose name and reputation match our own.

    “It is certainly something that has to be complete before the stadium is finished.

    “Arsenal got a very significant deal for the Emirates Stadium. And some of the figures coming out of the latest developments in America are very high.

    “It’s certainly possible to have a total deal over a period of years that runs into tens of millions, if not more.”

    Emirates Airlines are paying £100m to sponsor Arsenal’s new Ashburton Grove stadium over a 15-year period.


    While Manchester United’s Old Trafford stadium has grown to a 75,000-seater arena, the present Anfield has a capacity of only 45,000 and far fewer corporate boxes.

    “When we started this process about five or six years ago, we sat down and one of our concerns is that we were earning £1m less than Manchester United every home game,” said Mr Parry.

    “Since then, United have increased their capacity twice, so the gap is significantly greater now.’’

    “Hopefully the new stadium will give us more money to spend ultimately because it will generate greater revenues and that’s the whole point with the extra capacity.”

    Mr Parry said a final decision had not been taken on the number of corporate boxes, but it would be more than at present.

    The revised plan has been produced by leading architects HKS based in Dallas, the home of Tom Hicks.

    An eight metre hollow will be dug into the park near Arkles Lane and Priory Road to avoid causing controversy or breach planning rules.

    It is envisaged there will be a car park below the stadium, and as exclusively revealed by the Daily Post last year, corporate bunker suites overlooking the pitch.

    The new ground will also incorporate dedicated facilities for the Anfield Sport and Community Centre and Liverpool Hope University and external facilities will include tennis courts and new multi-use games area.

    The north and east facades will overlook Priory Road and Utting Avenue respectively, looking across gardens.

    The south side will have a more formal appearance at the northern edge to the new Anfield Plaza development which will replace the current ground.

    The stadium will have a stonework base on the north, west and east sides with mainly glass facades above. The south side will be clad in metal and overlook the Plaza.


    Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard said he was “blown away” by the plans and manager Rafael Benitez said: “The plans for the new stadium are absolutely fantastic.

    “It looks very different to other stadiums I have seen. There are a lot of windows and it really is ground-breaking in terms of stadium design.”

    Steven Gerrard said: “It’s amazing and the best thing about it, I think, is that it’s so different to any other.

    “We are Liverpool Football Club, We expect the best and this will be the best.

    “ I’ve played in some special stadiums but this is something special and it’s so important that we are not seen to be copying off another club.

    “The fact that a massive Kop stand will be incorporated into the new stadium is great.

    “I just hope I’m still around when the day comes for us to play our first game in it.”

    #2
    Good news
    Javier Mascherano: 'I want to be settled and kill myself on the pitch so the team wins lots of games'

    Comment


      #3
      An extra 100 mil would see us rival any team in the tranfer market,the extra revenue from increased capacity will also allow Rafa to bring in the best.Good times ahead.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Quinncy View Post
        An extra 100 mil would see us rival any team in the tranfer market,the extra revenue from increased capacity will also allow Rafa to bring in the best.Good times ahead.

        It looks ans IS going to be the most awesome Stadium in the UK and quite possibly one of the most uniquely designed Stadiums anywhere across Europs. Its gonna make old sh@tford look like something like Leggoland
        24Carra Gold
        Carra Carra Carra

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Quinncy View Post
          An extra 100 mil would see us rival any team in the tranfer market,the extra revenue from increased capacity will also allow Rafa to bring in the best.Good times ahead.
          If this is true, why do Arsenal seem to be in the ****ter at the minute in terms of finance?

          Comment


            #6
            i think the problem is the cost of building a stadium. loans are needed to pay for it so all the increased revenue is not going to go straight into the transfer pot also a bigger stadium costs more to run.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by retroquestions View Post
              If this is true, why do Arsenal seem to be in the ****ter at the minute in terms of finance?
              They've never spent huge amounts of money anyway, haven't had an investment like us, and consequently building the Emirates and the cost of that has had much more of an impact on their finances
              "the correct decision would have been a penalty for us a red card for Gattuso and a yellow for Stevie"

              LF Clove aka AFII 11/10/07

              "i personally hold you and several other gob****es responsible for the chaos this club is in"

              Revo on DJS

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Fiddy View Post
                They've never spent huge amounts of money anyway, haven't had an investment like us, and consequently building the Emirates and the cost of that has had much more of an impact on their finances
                Fiddy answered well.What was Highburys capacity,likewise Emirates?.They don`t have anywhere near the fanbase we have.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Quinncy View Post
                  Fiddy answered well.What was Highburys capacity,likewise Emirates?.They don`t have anywhere near the fanbase we have.
                  No they don't, but they certainly have sufficient demand to fill a 60,000 stadium week in, week out, and much like us the new stadium has not one anywhere near to clearin their season ticket waiting list.

                  Which proves to me that a 60,000 or 65,000 capacity stadium is too small for us, and we need to do everything we can to get the capacity to as high a figure as possible by the time it is ready to open.
                  White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                  Purslow = C*nt

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
                    No they don't, but they certainly have sufficient demand to fill a 60,000 stadium week in, week out, and much like us the new stadium has not one anywhere near to clearin their season ticket waiting list.

                    Which proves to me that a 60,000 or 65,000 capacity stadium is too small for us, and we need to do everything we can to get the capacity to as high a figure as possible by the time it is ready to open.
                    I think the original plans for "Adidas Anfield Arena" at a 60,000 capacity were submitted to test the water.Hopefully the Yanks can persuade the local council that extra seats means extra revenue in the local area and we`ll get up to 78,000 quickly.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Quinncy View Post
                      I think the original plans for "Adidas Anfield Arena" at a 60,000 capacity were submitted to test the water.Hopefully the Yanks can persuade the local council that extra seats means extra revenue in the local area and we`ll get up to 78,000 quickly.
                      Let's hope so. I think the only thing that is holding us up is the transport infrastructure, so I sincerely hope the club has plans and means to assist with upgrading it.
                      White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                      Purslow = C*nt

                      Comment


                        #12
                        From the Fiver:

                        Every Club Has Its Price


                        Paul Doyle
                        25 July 2007

                        THIS IS CARLSBERGMCDONALDSFIELD

                        After illness, debt, divorce and being suspended over an active
                        volcano by a psychopath with a grudge - which, come to think of it,
                        is usually what divorce means - moving gaff is one of life's most
                        stressful events. Will the new neighbours be nice? Can the removal
                        guys be trusted not to nick your valuables? Did the gurning estate
                        agent neglect to mention that your new pad was built on an ancient
                        cemetery and is therefore likely to be haunted by angry ghosts whose
                        freaky apparitions will be accompanied by a crummy-yet-catchy Alice
                        Cooper soundtrack? These are the standard questions any home-switcher
                        must ask.

                        Of course, if you're a famous football club such as Liverpool, many
                        other tricky issues must also be addressed - which is why the club's
                        suits were so triumphant today when they revealed the plans for their
                        new stadium and announced that all the critical criteria had been
                        met. Not only will the new ground boast a capacity of 60,000 seats -
                        almost 15,000 more than Anfield - but it will be designed so that
                        another 10,000 can be easily added as required. What's more,
                        according to club maestro and expert environmentalist Rick Parry, the
                        hulking mass of glass, steel and concrete will be "sympathetic to
                        Stanley Park".

                        A jubilant Parry insisted that the "heartbeat of the stadium", which
                        won't be ready until the 2010-11 season, will be the Kop, "which will
                        be as close as we can get to recreating the heady days of the 60s,
                        70s and 80s ... there will be 18,000 seats, steeply raked and tightly
                        packed with a roof, very much designed to provide every possible
                        acoustic benefit to preserve the atmosphere". And in fairness, there
                        can be little doubt that the wall of screaming Scousers will
                        intimidate opponents. Certainly more than Dirk Kuyt's shooting ever
                        will.

                        The only thing yet to be decided, then, is a name for Liverpool's new
                        home. Will they make like Arsenal and sell the naming rights to some
                        faceless corporate monster? Or will this proud club that values
                        tradition above all else turn down those easy bucks and go for
                        something more soulful?

                        Oh.
                        Remember, we're only adding to the nonsense.

                        Walking a lonely road one night, Nasruddin saw riders approaching. His imagination ran riot: he saw himself robbed or killed, so he climbed a wall into a graveyard and hid. Puzzled at his behaviour, the riders, who were followers of the Mullah, followed. Finding him cowering behind a grave, they asked "Great Sage, why are you hiding here?". "It's more complicated than you think" he replied, "I'm here because of you - and you're here because of me"

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Abdul Alhazred View Post
                          From the Fiver:

                          Every Club Has Its Price


                          Paul Doyle
                          25 July 2007

                          THIS IS CARLSBERGMCDONALDSFIELD

                          After illness, debt, divorce and being suspended over an active
                          volcano by a psychopath with a grudge - which, come to think of it,
                          is usually what divorce means - moving gaff is one of life's most
                          stressful events. Will the new neighbours be nice? Can the removal
                          guys be trusted not to nick your valuables? Did the gurning estate
                          agent neglect to mention that your new pad was built on an ancient
                          cemetery and is therefore likely to be haunted by angry ghosts whose
                          freaky apparitions will be accompanied by a crummy-yet-catchy Alice
                          Cooper soundtrack? These are the standard questions any home-switcher
                          must ask.

                          Of course, if you're a famous football club such as Liverpool, many
                          other tricky issues must also be addressed - which is why the club's
                          suits were so triumphant today when they revealed the plans for their
                          new stadium and announced that all the critical criteria had been
                          met. Not only will the new ground boast a capacity of 60,000 seats -
                          almost 15,000 more than Anfield - but it will be designed so that
                          another 10,000 can be easily added as required. What's more,
                          according to club maestro and expert environmentalist Rick Parry, the
                          hulking mass of glass, steel and concrete will be "sympathetic to
                          Stanley Park".

                          A jubilant Parry insisted that the "heartbeat of the stadium", which
                          won't be ready until the 2010-11 season, will be the Kop, "which will
                          be as close as we can get to recreating the heady days of the 60s,
                          70s and 80s ... there will be 18,000 seats, steeply raked and tightly
                          packed with a roof, very much designed to provide every possible
                          acoustic benefit to preserve the atmosphere". And in fairness, there
                          can be little doubt that the wall of screaming Scousers will
                          intimidate opponents. Certainly more than Dirk Kuyt's shooting ever
                          will.

                          The only thing yet to be decided, then, is a name for Liverpool's new
                          home. Will they make like Arsenal and sell the naming rights to some
                          faceless corporate monster? Or will this proud club that values
                          tradition above all else turn down those easy bucks and go for
                          something more soulful?

                          Oh.

                          Unfortunately we're going be reading more and more of this emotive tripe about tradition and soul in the run-up to the new stadium being built.

                          Liverpool is about one thing and one thing only - winning trophies. And if selling the stadium name will bring us in over £100m then I'm for it, and so should the rest of you.

                          It's our traditions and soul as this joker puts it, and our family-club ethos and atmosphere that made us fall so far behind Utd in the 90s. Football moves on and so should we, and nothing should stand between us and our pursuit for glory, certainly not our tradition and the weight of history.
                          White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                          Purslow = C*nt

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
                            And if selling the stadium name will bring us in over £100m then I'm for it, and so should the rest of you.
                            joins mass of right-thinking people
                            Remember, we're only adding to the nonsense.

                            Walking a lonely road one night, Nasruddin saw riders approaching. His imagination ran riot: he saw himself robbed or killed, so he climbed a wall into a graveyard and hid. Puzzled at his behaviour, the riders, who were followers of the Mullah, followed. Finding him cowering behind a grave, they asked "Great Sage, why are you hiding here?". "It's more complicated than you think" he replied, "I'm here because of you - and you're here because of me"

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X