Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Cheers for the welcome people. Clearly none of us have got a clue what it means, sure someone will be along who can clear things up, if not someone will pretend they know
Pocket Rocket (Rhodders) is a junior trainee assistant accountant so he'll tell us what it all means. If not, at least he'll tell us how to make a nice cup of tea...
There is a light that never goes out. RIP Alan "Mally" Johnston and the 96. YNWA.
Pocket Rocket (Rhodders) is a junior trainee assistant accountant so he'll tell us what it all means. If not, at least he'll tell us how to make a nice cup of tea...
they need a new investment banker, in a nutshell.
in basic terms, us folk in the UK call it gearing.
100% means your totally debt structured
0 % means your totally equity structured (shares etc)
both has advantages, being too highly geared can be dangerous, because no matter how you perform, you have to pay interest, where as if you perform badly, you can usually avoid paying dividends.
there's nothing too much in that really, it was fairly obvious from the start that the Americans weren't putting all the money up to buy the club without any debt.
in basic terms, us folk in the UK call it gearing.
100% means your totally debt structured
0 % means your totally equity structured (shares etc)
both has advantages, being too highly geared can be dangerous, because no matter how you perform, you have to pay interest, where as if you perform badly, you can usually avoid paying dividends.
there's nothing too much in that really, it was fairly obvious from the start that the Americans weren't putting all the money up to buy the club without any debt.
So in other words no investment bankers means no stadium and no bridging loan paid to RBS, right?
in basic terms, us folk in the UK call it gearing.
100% means your totally debt structured
0 % means your totally equity structured (shares etc)
both has advantages, being too highly geared can be dangerous, because no matter how you perform, you have to pay interest, where as if you perform badly, you can usually avoid paying dividends.
there's nothing too much in that really, it was fairly obvious from the start that the Americans weren't putting all the money up to buy the club without any debt.
Cheers, Rhodders...
...and two sugars in mine please...
There is a light that never goes out. RIP Alan "Mally" Johnston and the 96. YNWA.
in basic terms, us folk in the UK call it gearing.
100% means your totally debt structured
0 % means your totally equity structured (shares etc)
both has advantages, being too highly geared can be dangerous, because no matter how you perform, you have to pay interest, where as if you perform badly, you can usually avoid paying dividends.
there's nothing too much in that really, it was fairly obvious from the start that the Americans weren't putting all the money up to buy the club without any debt.
My immediate concern is if we have the money to build that cushy new stadium - or will it go belly up b4 the first JCB arrives!
So the article is basically saying that we haven't been able to secure the money for the stadium or to pay the bridging loan that was taken out to actually buy the club, is that right?
Almost, the bridging loan is in place, they are just looking to refinance it. at the same time they would like to link that refinancing for a wider loan to pay for the stadium. The ugly feckers from Manusa had similar problems when they were launching their take over bid. They sacked their financial advisers from memory. The market is very volatile at present so it is cautious on delas this size.
"When Sir Henry broke a fast, you cursed double glazing."
in basic terms, us folk in the UK call it gearing.
100% means your totally debt structured
0 % means your totally equity structured (shares etc)
both has advantages, being too highly geared can be dangerous, because no matter how you perform, you have to pay interest, where as if you perform badly, you can usually avoid paying dividends.
there's nothing too much in that really, it was fairly obvious from the start that the Americans weren't putting all the money up to buy the club without any debt.
Nicely Googled :whatever:
Quote of the year :
"With monkey me, dogface dishwasher bitch and chimp the ****ing champ you. We are turning into a raving party here arent we"
Originally posted by steveheighwayrobberyView Post
Almost, the bridging loan is in place, they are just looking to refinance it. at the same time they would like to link that refinancing for a wider loan to pay for the stadium. The ugly feckers from Manusa had similar problems when they were launching their take over bid. They sacked their financial advisers from memory. The market is very volatile at present so it is cautious on delas this size.
Thanks, lads.
I have no idea about these things so it's nice to get some people in the know to clarify things for me.
Comment