Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crouch storms out?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    City set to offer Crouch an £8m way out

    Sven Goran Eriksson will be able to buy Peter Crouch for £8million in the January transfer window if he follows up his interest in the Liverpool and England striker.

    The Manchester City manager has put Crouch on his list of possibles after learning that he is unhappy at his failure to secure a regular starting place this season and is ready to quit Anfield.

    Peter Crouch

    Peter out: Crouch would welcome a move to City after falling from grace at Anfield

    Eriksson needs a centre forward after losing Valeri Bojinov with a serious knee injury and believes 26-year-old Crouch is one of the most proficient strikers in the Premier League.

    Crouch cost £7m when he moved to Anfield from Southampton two years ago and City feared that a price tag between £12m-£15m would put them out of the running, but it is understood Liverpool are prepared to take substantially less.

    Crouch will only have 18 months left on his contract in January. He has made it clear he will not sign a new deal as long as coach Rafael Benitez prefers Fernando Torres, Dirk Kuyt and Andriy Voronin in his rotation policy.

    This season Crouch has made just one League start and his only goal came in the second leg of the Champions League qualifier against Toulouse.

    Crouch is aware of City's interest and has told friends he would relish the opportunity to join up with Eriksson, who gave him his England chance and took him to the World Cup Finals in Germany.

    Eriksson believes that £8m would represent a good price for Crouch — a player he knows and trusts.

    He said: "I've spoken to the people upstairs and the news at the moment is good. I'm told that I can operate in January, so that is good."

    Despite their impressive start to the season, there is concern among City's coaching staff that the current team may not have enough goals and they are lacking a 20-goal per season striker.

    They are relying on Emile Mpenza as a lone striker while Georgios Samaras seeks a return to form and Italian Rolando Bianchi tries to settle in England.

    Bianchi was the big hope when he arrived in the summer but he has disappointed after scoring on his debut and there are some at City who are already wondering if he has the physical ability and appetite to prosper in the Premier League.

    Eriksson has been told by owner Thaksin Shinawatra that he can go back with a £4m bid for Palermo midfielder Mark Bresciano — who he almost signed in August — and that he can have money for a centre forward.

    The former Thai prime minister is not able to bankroll Eriksson to the extent that has been suggested by some and is certainly not able to spend money in the same lavish fashion that Roman Abramovich has at Chelsea.

    Indeed, it was because Palermo wanted £4m in one up-front payment that the deal to sign Bresciano failed. England defender Micah Richards has vowed to sign a new contract at City, despite negotiations dragging on.

    Richards, 19, said: "I'm in final talks and hopefully we'll have something signed very, very soon, it's just down to the finer details.

    "It's certainly not the case that I want to move anywhere. I'm looking for a new house in Manchester, so why would I want to move anywhere now?

    "I'm enjoying my football week in, week out and I'm playing for England, so what more could I want at the moment?"

    Comment


      a bargain at 8 mill

      Comment


        Originally posted by kewellnthegang View Post
        a bargain at 8 mill
        His contract is running short, so one can't expect more IMO.

        Comment


          Originally posted by kewellnthegang View Post
          a bargain at 8 mill
          i agree, i dont like the ****er but i understand football and realise in the right style of play he could be effective for a team challenging for 5-8th place in the table. a championship winning team?? no

          look what bent went for!!! 8 million would be too cheap, should be closer to 13.75 million with extra payments being made to us on the off chance the lanky **** puts one in with his head
          "Sky and Setanta have the right to choose their games and it will be the same for everyone. So Mr Ferguson will not be complaining about fixtures and a campaign against United.

          "Or there is another option. That Mr Ferguson organises the fixtures in his office and sends it to us and everyone will know and cannot complain. That is simple."

          Comment


            City want a 20 goal a season striker?

            Why are they going for Crouch then?

            If he took more of his headers, he would be in that bracket at Liverpool. But he doesn't and he is not.
            Oh I don't know.

            Comment


              Thought we were crazy for paying 6m for him and they are worse if they pay 8m.
              His career will go nowhere when he leaves us.

              It will be interesting to see if anyone would go in for Pennant if we sold him and at what price.
              Oh the man is a midfield maestro
              and his passes are sooo delightful
              everyone wants to know
              Alonso Alonso Alonso

              Comment


                Originally posted by PostmanPat View Post
                Thought we were crazy for paying 6m for him and they are worse if they pay 8m.
                His career will go nowhere when he leaves us.

                It will be interesting to see if anyone would go in for Pennant if we sold him and at what price.
                4mill - a steal

                boro ????

                Comment


                  From Liverpoolfc.tv

                  Rafael Benitez has moved to end rumours surrounding the future of Peter Crouch by insisting: "He is not for sale."
                  Speculation has been rife that the Reds' striker will be heading for the Anfield exit door during the next transfer window after failing to establish himself as a first team regular this season.

                  But Benitez insists Crouch still has a big part to play at the club and isn't available for transfer.

                  "People have been talking about Peter Crouch for two months, but he is our player and we don’t want to sell him.

                  "He is a nice boy, a good professional, a good player. It is clear that this team now with four strikers creates more competition for places, but I don't have any problems because Crouch is a good player."

                  The Liverpool manager was also pleased to welcome Yossi Benayoun back to Melwood after the Israeli midfielder decided to return early from his country's training camp.

                  "He knows he needs to be training if he wants to be part of Saturday's team, so he was back training today," added Benitez.

                  "He was tired, but happy to be back."

                  Comment


                    Watched the Peter Crouch Doc on Amazon Prime last night. It is decent.

                    [ame="https://youtu.be/PEsws05F0JE"]That Peter Crouch Film | Official Trailer - YouTube[/ame]

                    This needs moved to the Legends ex players thread and title change?
                    Modifying post.

                    Comment


                      Awesome... need to convince my girlfriend to watch it with me after all those episodes of Married at First Sight I watched.

                      Was probably my favourite player at the time (apart from Stevie).

                      Never properly forgave Rafa for dropping him in the CL final. Utterly dumb decision.
                      In the beginning, Fowler created the Heaven and the Earth.

                      Comment


                        I enjoyed it.

                        Reading this thread was interesting. Reaffirms my opinion that Dirk Kuyt was useless as a centreforward, anyway.

                        Did not realise he hit 100PL goals, but his England ratio was pretty impressive too 22/42. Owen had 40/89. Fowler had 7/26.
                        In the beginning, Fowler created the Heaven and the Earth.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Charly View Post
                          I enjoyed it.

                          Reading this thread was interesting. Reaffirms my opinion that Dirk Kuyt was useless as a centreforward, anyway.

                          Did not realise he hit 100PL goals, but his England ratio was pretty impressive too 22/42. Owen had 40/89. Fowler had 7/26.
                          He would be ****ing immense as Bobby's replacement. Unfortunately intelligent, hard working players didn't get the credit they deserved back then.
                          If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                          Comment


                            He was nowhere near Bobby's class. He wasnt that great on the ball and lacked pace or agility. Not sure his vision was that great either.

                            Nobody more hard working though. Great down the wing against teams better than us (mainly Chelsea). I think Rafa had to reinvent him as he just didnt offer enough as a single striker, as opposed to a player like Torres. I guess the opposite of Bobby, who was a bit average on the wing, but fantastic as the false 9.
                            In the beginning, Fowler created the Heaven and the Earth.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X