Anyone who bought their away shirt from Littlewoods

[Rowan]

Read on...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7061767.stm

[Pablo]

Haha, serves Littlewoods right, its their own fault they gone done like that.

They have zero chance of getting refunds from people, absolutely zero.

[Harv]

****ing idiots.

[Jayesh87]

[Le Chef]

Haha, serves Littlewoods right, its their own fault they gone done like that.

They have zero chance of getting refunds from people, absolutely zero.

Unless they redebit your card ?

[jonnygrunter]

Unless they redebit your card ?

pretty sure that this is illegal as you have not authorised it. might be wrong though.

[AFII]

pretty sure that this is illegal as you have not authorised it. might be wrong though.

Maybe they could ask Dunk.

[PLY]

It is illegal. If they wish to take you to Small Claims Court it will cost them £30 so no chance of that either. They're pissing in the wind with this one I'm afraid.

[Slim]

They can **** off. I'm not giving them any money back, the ****s!

[Craig_H]

They can **** off. I'm not giving them any money back, the ****s!

[Morph]

Good thing that cards expired since then isn't it

By the time they get round to it, they can just have the shirt back, it'll be worthless in about 6 months

[sonsofthedesert]

Shopper wins Littlewoods battle

Littlewoods is waging war against "ineligible" voucher users
Trading standards officers in Derbyshire have intervened to support a shopper claiming discount vouchers from Littlewoods.
The catalogue group has angered some shoppers by demanding that an online discount voucher be paid back.

The money-off voucher was meant for a small number of specific customers, but spread virally on internet chat rooms.

The BBC has now learned that Tim Hill, from Derbyshire has been successful in keeping his £48.50 discount.

He told the BBC that the credit had been deducted by Littlewoods from his account almost two months after he used it.

Derbyshire Trading Standards took up Mr Hill's battle to uphold the discount he had accessed from a football forum.

A spokesman for Derbyshire County Council said: "This is a case where the customer used a discount code advertised on a third-party's website.

"Some companies state that if customers try to use discounts to which they're not entitled, they will be charged in full.

"But in this case the sale was made with the discount and the goods dispatched so the contract was accepted by the seller and we felt that a further charge shouldn't have been made."

A Littlewoods spokesman said he didn't know anything about the refund to Mr Hill and said he would pursue the matter.

Littlewoods has stuck by its tough line that discount vouchers which spread over internet forum should not be honoured because of its online terms and conditions.

It is demanding that a £25-off discount voucher issued in July be paid back to the UK web retailer by those who found the code on a money-saving or social network website.

if you think that the vouchers are not destined for you and you use them anyway, you could be breaking the law

Allan Auty, manager, Liverpool Trading Standards

Littlewoods says that the voucher was sent out as a flyer to a specific group of about 78,000 account holders as a gift for any inconvenience caused by the retailer's simplification of its data base.

Terms and conditions

Bargain hunters are furious at what they see as Littlewoods reneging on a contract of sale.

They are also angry that Littlewoods has taken over two months to pursue the alleged offenders, by which time they can no longer return the purchased items under the store's returns policy.

One aggrieved voucher user James Gosnold believed the situation had important implications for online trading standards.

He added: "Can you imagine buying something in a sale at High Street shop only to discover two months later that the sale price didn't apply to you? And that you didn't have the option to return the goods?"

But Littlewoods' position has been upheld by Liverpool Trading Standards, the home authority for the store.

The regional body's manager Allan Auty told the BBC that shoppers should make sure that they are legally entitled to the deals before they go ahead and use them.

He said: "In fact, if you think that the vouchers are not destined for you and you use them anyway, you could be breaking the law and it may not be the retailer knocking on your door, it could be the police."

Binding contract?

One lawyer who spoke to the BBC on conditon of anonymity agreed with the argument that once an offer of payment has been accepted by a business and the goods dispatched, a contract has been agreed which cannot be broken.

'Sincere apologies'

Mr Hill said: "Littlewoods tried all sorts of tricks and told us different stories why they couldn't reinstate the discount, but eventually they added the £48.50 to my account."

He even received an email from a Littlewoods staff member offering "sincere apologies" for the inconvenience" he was caused with a confirmation of the credit.

BBC LINK

[Chrono]

Does nobody get this? This is complete marketing hype. They know they wont get any money back and who issues vouchers that can be reproduced by any Tom, Dick or Harry. This is exactly the same thing as the Threshers vouchers that apparently got sent to people other than distributors. Amazing offer as it was and looked potentially bankrupting, they recorded their highest profit for a christmas ever.

Why would a lawyer anonymously comment on this if they are just stating legal facts? Scared he wont be welcome back at Littlewoods? Nah! Have any of you been contacted?

Also, if you ever hear ludicrous insurance claims and can guarantee you 9/10 that the story is utterly false.

[Rocket]

haha, i bought two, i'll look forward to going to court twice

[Morph]

the way I see it they'll only try to do it to people who have a littlewoods account, because they might possibly be in their rights to charge a customer, with a customer who used a credit card or a debit card, i don't see how they can because they'd be making an unauthorise debit on your account