Originally posted by DJS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wenger & Rotation
Collapse
X
-
I sympathize with Rafa, that football is different now. But it is. Rightly or wrongly, managers wont get anything like 8 years now.Originally posted by Quinncy View PostFergie took 8 yrs to win the title!!!!!!
I said when Rafa was appointed, that he should get 6 years, as long as we're still qualifying for the CL each year. And i'll stand by that.
Comment
-
Same here,as long as Rafa wins enough to keep the Club in the Black the yanks will be happy,I hope.It`s all down to finance these days.CL qualification is vital every yr and i can really see us winning the P{L in the next few yrs.But one disastrous season and the owners will be looking for a new manager.Originally posted by DJS View PostI sympathize with Rafa, that football is different now. But it is. Rightly or wrongly, managers wont get anything like 8 years now.
I said when Rafa was appointed, that he should get 6 years, as long as we're still qualifying for the CL each year. And i'll stand by that.
Comment
-
i think a lot depends on whether we're actually progressing each season. last season was a step backwards in the league compared to the season before. we should have bettered our previous result and didn't, that is disappointing.Originally posted by Quinncy View PostSame here,as long as Rafa wins enough to keep the Club in the Black the yanks will be happy,I hope.It`s all down to finance these days.CL qualification is vital every yr and i can really see us winning the P{L in the next few yrs.But one disastrous season and the owners will be looking for a new manager.
of course a manger should be given time in the job as long as he has a clear vision and an outlined plan for the long term future of the club. if you look at the work rafa's doing with the reserves and academy you can see we're in safe hands here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJS View Post
We've got good players.
The difference is, their's are usually on the pitch, as opposed to the bench.
You're making out like he drops them for every game here Syd. Stevie and Torres are USUALLY on the pitch it just so happens that one time this season they were both on the bench we drew.
**** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.
Comment
-
Seeing as Maestro has given this a bump I was thinking about the rotation for Pompey. I wonder whether Rafa doesn't use a much more sophisticated notion of which games to rotate in than is generally noted. My theory is that he would look at the expected number of points gained and how much this would be altered by playing or otherwise his top players. The results gained by top teams indicate that Pompey away is a game where big teams struggle to win irrelevant of what team they put out - thus the expected points tally (as bourne out by ourselves and Uniteds recent results there) is 1 point. The change in the likelyhood of getting a win by playing any different team is small and we can easily put out a number of teams capable of containing them and thus maximising the likelyhood of getting the one point. Whereas some games such as the top four sides home and away and less defensively sound teams like Manchester City say we would have a much better chance of getting more points if we played Torres etc."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William Blake
Comment
-
which basically means that he doesn't expect more than a point from some games in the first place ...Originally posted by dww View PostSeeing as Maestro has given this a bump I was thinking about the rotation for Pompey. I wonder whether Rafa doesn't use a much more sophisticated notion of which games to rotate in than is generally noted. My theory is that he would look at the expected number of points gained and how much this would be altered by playing or otherwise his top players. The results gained by top teams indicate that Pompey away is a game where big teams struggle to win irrelevant of what team they put out - thus the expected points tally (as bourne out by ourselves and Uniteds recent results there) is 1 point. The change in the likelyhood of getting a win by playing any different team is small and we can easily put out a number of teams capable of containing them and thus maximising the likelyhood of getting the one point. Whereas some games such as the top four sides home and away and less defensively sound teams like Manchester City say we would have a much better chance of getting more points if we played Torres etc.
maybe he simply thought that torres - due to being new in the league - would physically struggle in a place like pompey...
Comment
-
Obviously there are a lot of possibilities for individual rotations.Originally posted by fred_plasticine View Postwhich basically means that he doesn't expect more than a point from some games in the first place ...
maybe he simply thought that torres - due to being new in the league - would physically struggle in a place like pompey...
The point is slightly (very slightly) more subtle that you suggest as:
The judgement is about the amount of change to the probability of getting Xpts playing a different team would make. Therefore it is not simple a matter of looking at the quality of the opposition but the style which they play etc. (which you allude to in your post). Which contrasts with DJSs point of view that if a game is against a good team we should always play our first choice XI.
Which in a way ends up being similar to Speedy's point about picking an appropriate team."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William Blake
Comment
-
You're making out he does it every week though.Originally posted by DJS View PostDoesnt that tell you something?
And NO IT DOESN'T it's not inconceivable that even with Torres and Gerrard on the park we still could of drew or even lost the game.**** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.
Comment
Comment