Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New stadium update...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
    Accoustics & environment are a vital part of atmosphere creation.

    Whatever happened to "the best stadium in the world"?

    Charlatans.

    Going by what RS4 has said the improved design by AFL is as good a stadium minus 200 million worth of aestetic steel cladding. Is "the best stadium in the world" not created by "the best fans in the world"?
    Dare we believe

    Comment


      Originally posted by rushscored4 View Post
      OK, I was talking to my architect mate again last night and apparently AFL are very confident that their revised design will get the nod over the much more expensive HKS stadium. Both firms have been asked for plans and costs and the AFL design is coming in around £200m less than HKS.

      He says the boardroom at AFL is full of images of their amended plans and he says it looks awesome with a much bigger Kop rising at one end (to accommodate the extra 10,000 fans) and two Wembley-style arches over the stadium. Unfortunately, however, he can't sneak any photos out so you'll have to take his (and my) word for it.

      Apparently G & H have already had several meetings with one of AFL's senior partners (I know his name but won't publish it here) and the Manchester firm think they will get the nod.

      That is all...
      Good man matey

      You're a good lad for an old ****er
      **** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.

      Comment


        Originally posted by blacky View Post
        Going by what RS4 has said the improved design by AFL is as good a stadium minus 200 million worth of aestetic steel cladding. Is "the best stadium in the world" not created by "the best fans in the world"?
        Anybody in the biz man would know that "aestetic steel cladding" is a bogus statement dude!

        Comment


          Originally posted by The_Milkman View Post
          I heard Superdan is designing the new stadium
          Originally posted by chrispy View Post
          Oh ****. I can imagine what that's gonna look like then 200,000 seater with room for expansion


          Originally posted by Darth Marty View Post
          but with a crap "this is new anfield" font
          Originally posted by chrispy View Post
          Contrary to popular belief, I have huge genitals.

          Comment


            Originally posted by blacky View Post
            Going by what RS4 has said the improved design by AFL is as good a stadium minus 200 million worth of aestetic steel cladding. Is "the best stadium in the world" not created by "the best fans in the world"?
            It is, but speaking objectively you couldn't argue that Anfield is the best stadium in the world.

            Whilst I admit the steel price will have catapulted of late, I fail to see how a figures as large as £200m (approx 45-50% of the total cost) could be saved merely by aesthetics. A large part of the steel will be involved in the structure itself.
            3rd place. Worst champions ever.

            Comment


              Originally posted by rushscored4 View Post
              OK, I was talking to my architect mate again last night and apparently AFL are very confident that their revised design will get the nod over the much more expensive HKS stadium. Both firms have been asked for plans and costs and the AFL design is coming in around £200m less than HKS.

              He says the boardroom at AFL is full of images of their amended plans and he says it looks awesome with a much bigger Kop rising at one end (to accommodate the extra 10,000 fans) and two Wembley-style arches over the stadium. Unfortunately, however, he can't sneak any photos out so you'll have to take his (and my) word for it.

              Apparently G & H have already had several meetings with one of AFL's senior partners (I know his name but won't publish it here) and the Manchester firm think they will get the nod.

              That is all...
              I hope not

              Cheers for the info.

              Comment


                Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                It is, but speaking objectively you couldn't argue that Anfield is the best stadium in the world.

                Whilst I admit the steel price will have catapulted of late, I fail to see how a figures as large as £200m (approx 45-50% of the total cost) could be saved merely by aesthetics. A large part of the steel will be involved in the structure itself.
                Yes, sound a bit odd that.

                I am still hoping for the spaceship one

                Oh, an cheers RS4.

                --== Because the gang and the government is no different ==--

                Comment


                  Top man for posting RS4.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Cormack74 View Post
                    Top man for posting RS4.
                    OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Michael View Post
                      OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                        It is, but speaking objectively you couldn't argue that Anfield is the best stadium in the world.

                        Whilst I admit the steel price will have catapulted of late, I fail to see how a figures as large as £200m (approx 45-50% of the total cost) could be saved merely by aesthetics. A large part of the steel will be involved in the structure itself.
                        Your probably right but I'm in a "the glass is half full" mood today and looking at positives in everything. I just don't want the yanks straddling us with 500 million worth of debt!!
                        Dare we believe

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post


                          Hmmm - they have had time to meet with AFL but not with Rafa

                          I didn't say the meetings were over here. If you want the partner's name PM me.



                          Originally posted by Michael View Post
                          Mate. You've just included a lot of stuff I said the other day and I just want to confirm that I am not your source!!
                          Sorry Michael I didn't read your post(s) the other day. I am merely repeating what I was told last night in good faith.

                          Originally posted by bobbyfallon View Post
                          so this being the third 'new' design is the capacity starting at 60,000 and rising or fixed or whats goin on ??? ****ing yanks. i remember them saying the spade must be in the ground shortly etc
                          The revised AFL design is for a 70,000 capacity which is 9,000 more than their original plans.

                          Originally posted by blacky View Post
                          Going by what RS4 has said the improved design by AFL is as good a stadium minus 200 million worth of aestetic steel cladding. Is "the best stadium in the world" not created by "the best fans in the world"?
                          Agreed...

                          45,000 at Anfield already creates a better atmosphere for big matches than 60,000 at the Emirates or 76,000 at Old Trafford.

                          Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                          Whilst I admit the steel price will have catapulted of late, I fail to see how a figures as large as £200m (approx 45-50% of the total cost) could be saved merely by aesthetics. A large part of the steel will be involved in the structure itself.
                          I'm not saying that is ALL of the extra £200m construction cost but the steel cladding is a large part of it as I understand.

                          Originally posted by Michael View Post
                          OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                          There is a light that never goes out. RIP Alan "Mally" Johnston and the 96. YNWA.

                          Comment


                            Personally I'd be gutted if they didn't go with the HSK design. It also means starting the planning process again.
                            Oh I don't know.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by dom9 View Post
                              It also means starting the planning process again.
                              That's what I've been wondering, does it?
                              I hate Polanski

                              Comment


                                It has to.

                                Current planning permission is for 60,000 odd seats. Also the height, footprint and general look of the ground is covered by this.

                                It's like getting permission to build yourself a 2 bedroom bungalow in a field, then actually building a 2 storey house with 4 bedrooms.
                                Oh I don't know.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X