Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2007 LFC Player of the Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    2007 LFC Player of the Year



    Steven Gerrard has seen off stiff competition from Fernando Torres and Javier Mascherano to scoop Fans' Player of the Year for 2007.
    The skipper received 53 per cent of the vote in an exclusive poll on this website.

    Torres came second with 18 per cent despite playing only five months of the year at Anfield. Mascherano was third with eight per cent, with Jamie Carragher fourth and Pepe Reina fifth.

    The accolade went to Gerrard after he helped lead the Reds to a second Champions League final in three seasons.

    There were also stunning free-kicks against the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle, and moments of magic which dragged Liverpool out of the mire against teams like Villa and Derby.

    Stay logged on to Liverpoolfc.tv on Wednesday to see who fans voted Young Player of 2007.

    #2
    I'm surprised it wasn't won by Insua.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Shanks65 View Post
      http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/drill...80101-1109.htm

      Steven Gerrard has seen off stiff competition from Fernando Torres and Javier Mascherano to scoop Fans' Player of the Year for 2007.
      The skipper received 53 per cent of the vote in an exclusive poll on this website.

      Torres came second with 18 per cent despite playing only five months of the year at Anfield. Mascherano was third with eight per cent, with Jamie Carragher fourth and Pepe Reina fifth.

      The accolade went to Gerrard after he helped lead the Reds to a second Champions League final in three seasons.

      There were also stunning free-kicks against the likes of Arsenal and Newcastle, and moments of magic which dragged Liverpool out of the mire against teams like Villa and Derby.

      Stay logged on to Liverpoolfc.tv on Wednesday to see who fans voted Young Player of 2007.
      Quite rightly SG won by a mile.
      He's been head & shoulders our best player and without him we'd be only half the team we are.
      Surprised Pepe was only 5th, he'd have been 2nd choice for me.
      AKA Heighway No9

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        I'm surprised it wasn't won by Insua.
        *Waits for AFII...*

        Comment


          #5
          Can't really complain with that.

          I'm split between Gerrard & Mascherano, however as Gerrard has scored a lot of vital goals then he gets my vote.

          Torres has done more in 5 months than Kuyt has in 16. Think Crouch should get a mention for some of his important CL goals & performances at the start of 2007.

          Reina & Carragher - certainly top 5.

          Comment


            #6
            Pepe is most improved, Finnen, most consistant but Gerrard has been the best.
            Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
            Those that killed her, were following the law.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              I'm surprised it wasn't won by Insua.
              He won the 'better than regular first teamers but not quite ready for the first team yet player of 2007' award.
              Like blood on iron

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                He won the 'better than regular first teamers but not quite ready for the first team yet player of 2007' award.
                He's not as good as Buchtmann. FACT.

                When I say "FACT" I mean it's MY OPINION and I believe Rafa agree with me.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  He's not as good as Buchtmann. FACT.

                  When I say "FACT" I mean it's MY OPINION and I believe Rafa agree with me.
                  Don't you mean the plural of agree, that being agrees?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by publiusscipio View Post
                    Don't you mean the plural of agree, that being agrees?
                    He do but I don't know whether I does, IN MY OPINION.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      What was that poll where Kuyt finished second?
                      I hate Polanski

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        He do but I don't know whether I does, IN MY OPINION.
                        Have you thought of using a bigger font, sometimes that makes things clearer
                        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                        -- William Blake

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by dww View Post
                          Have you thought of using a bigger font, sometimes that makes things clearer
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Ok, is there a reason why every other post is of a dog?
                            Bill Oddie, Bill Oddie, put your hands all over my body.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              It's just the way things are.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X