just caught a bit of chelseatv and gerrard come up with terry and the england captaincy. john terry said capello had not contacted him yet blah blah blah. the panel then agreed with each other that gerrard was inconsitant and and not good enough for the england captaincy. then the question was asked was he good enough for chelsea. they all agreed with each other again where would he play, ballack lampard essien and mikel they all agreed were better than stevie. ****ing unbelievable
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gerrard
Collapse
X
-
Revo, correct me if I am wrong but you are in England? If so go to bed, you must be smashed if you watching those pricks.Originally posted by Revo View Postjust caught a bit of chelseatv and gerrard come up with terry and the england captaincy. john terry said capello had not contacted him yet blah blah blah. the panel then agreed with each other that gerrard was inconsitant and and not good enough for the england captaincy. then the question was asked was he good enough for chelsea. they all agreed with each other again where would he play, ballack lampard essien and mikel they all agreed were better than stevie. ****ing unbelievable
Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24
-
Hope you had a shower afterwardsOriginally posted by Revo View Postjust caught a bit of chelseatv and gerrard come up with terry and the england captaincy. john terry said capello had not contacted him yet blah blah blah. the panel then agreed with each other that gerrard was inconsitant and and not good enough for the england captaincy. then the question was asked was he good enough for chelsea. they all agreed with each other again where would he play, ballack lampard essien and mikel they all agreed were better than stevie. ****ing unbelievable
Comment
-
True it's ridiculous but probably no more inane than some of the pro-Liverpool crap talked on LFCTV (or elsewhere on these boards).Originally posted by Revo View Postjust caught a bit of chelseatv and gerrard come up with terry and the england captaincy. john terry said capello had not contacted him yet blah blah blah. the panel then agreed with each other that gerrard was inconsitant and and not good enough for the england captaincy. then the question was asked was he good enough for chelsea. they all agreed with each other again where would he play, ballack lampard essien and mikel they all agreed were better than stevie. ****ing unbelievable
Crikey, I'm beginning to sound uncomfortably like DJS.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment

Comment