Dubai International to make bid for Liverpool FC

[Jayesh87]

In my opinion, for what it's worth, since the cock-up of selling to the wank's Moore's and Parry have played a blinder recently.

How much influence would they have though?

[Rafa Shankly]

In my opinion, for what it's worth, since the cock-up of selling to the wank's Moore's and Parry have played a blinder recently.

how do you see this ending up tom.

do you reckon we will be stuck with tweedle dee and tweedle dum or will DIC take over?

oppinion rather than knowledge.

[Dhav]

In my opinion, for what it's worth, since the cock-up of selling to the wank's Moore's and Parry have played a blinder recently.

It's beginning to look like that, seems they're frustrating the finalizing of this re-finance deal, particularly if jayjay's post above is accurate, but would I be right in saying that if Hicks and Gillett are in agreement they could have them removed from the board?

[disco]

How much influence would they have though?

That's what I'm struggling with. Why can't they just sack Moores and Parry?!

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

In my opinion, for what it's worth, since the cock-up of selling to the wank's Moore's and Parry have played a blinder recently.

Rick's still a prick for those ties though.

And to be honest they haven't played a blinder, all they done is brought another set of foreign grasping cunts to the table to milk the club.

Can't understand the excitement over this speculation. Instead of hamburger ****ers we might be getting camel ****ers.

[Dhav]

That's what I'm struggling with. Why can't they just sack Moores and Parry?!

Thinking back to corporate governance now so please excuse me if I'm wrong, but I think they would basically both (ie G&H) have to be in agreement to do that, and if it's true that Gillett doesn;t want to burden the club with debt then this may be what's keeping Parry and Moores in there right now.

[Morten_nogamst_Pedersen]

That's what I'm struggling with. Why can't they just sack Moores and Parry?!

Isn't Moores an honorary and lifetime member or chairman of the board.
Pretty unsackable him atleast.

[blacky]

It's not rocket science as CMS says. Why would H&G advertise they were struggling to refinance and wanted out. It would devalue the club and give DIC the opportunity to put in an offer below the clubs estimated value. If H&G know DIC are interested then they will obviously use the press to say they are not selling to try drive up the price of the club to increase their profit.

[Vermilion]

I see now, but what if, i mean no you never know, if thats true ofcourse, ah but then he might or they could er, aha then there's those guys trying that also, the bank what about the bank, will they or wont they, you just can never tell in this business, but they say no & he says maybe, OH I'M CONFUSED.

[barnes10]

i think its down to gillett.

he's in a position to say to hicks 'im not signing that 350 mill loan' if he does that. we go to DIC (or RBS...)

There were rumours of gillett looking to find an alternative partner to hicks and just maybe DIC are the obvious candidates.

At this stage, as long as hicks goes im happy. gillett has purposely stayed quiet imho so if he was as much of a pr1ck then he'd have piped up somewhere along the line.

lets wait and see but i hope gillett gives that texan @sshole no choice but to eff off and take a reasonable offer.

[Tom]

It's beginning to look like that, seems they're frustrating the finalizing of this re-finance deal, particularly if jayjay's post above is accurate, but would I be right in saying that if Hicks and Gillett are in agreement they could have them removed from the board?

It would be a PR disaster for he yanks though if they tried that. It'd be all but over for them especially with all the current bad feeling after klingon.

[kopdan]

basically I want to know

Are we getting DIC or is G&H staying

Are we any clearer after today?

[Pacman]

basically I want to know

Are we getting DIC or is G&H staying

Are we any clearer after today?

I think H&G aren't going anywhere.

[jayjay]

Quote: Tom
When the stories about DIC wanting to buy a % of the club and then pulling out due to quoted price broke last week, I said this was in fact not true and that negotiations were continuing and parties on both sides were serious. My source on this was an ex-liverpool fc finance officer.

Thanks for explaining.

Have you heard anything about DM having an insurance policy against takeover costs being loaded onto the club? While I have every reason to believe my contact based on our dealings over the years I don't understand how it could be possible.

[Fivex]

Not sure if this has been posted but this email is doing the rounds.

DONT KNOW HOW TRUE THIS IS BUT SOMETHIN ON FRONT OF THE
ECHO!!!

Mark this date in your calenders ? February 18th 2008. Massive press
conference being planned at Anfield as we speak. The club has been sold
to DIC for 375 million pounds that will give the current owners $710
million? a $70 million profit. Al Ansari, CEO of DIC has completed his
due diligence.

The players and staff were made aware of this prior to the Luton game.
Rafa's job is safe but he has to bring in an assistant, this will be
Gary McAllister. Rick Parry who offended members of DIC last year, will
'step down' and the new owners will bring in David Dein as a
replacement.

No more money will be available for transfer's in the January window as
the current owners will not sanction any deals, unless players are
sold. The Summer will see massive player investment from DIC, believed
to be in the region of 85 million + whatever is made from player sales.
This could see a transfer budget of around 115 million. This is not a
rumour, this is all ligit.

Remember who told you the Americans had brought the club, four days
before it was released and who let you guys know that Fernando Torres
had signed a deal a full week before the press even got wind of it.
Thats me. From Anfield Insider


This isn't that fat donut eating prick making up bull again is it?