Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quick Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by kop-al-74 View Post
    Kuyt touched the ball once in the 10 mins he was on the pitch.I thought crouch showed a few nice touches.And ofcourse, he scored.

    The header kuyt missed was shocking.
    That is simply wrong.

    As for the rest, Crouch was on for 90 minutes and hardly did a thing. He did well with the tap-in though in the last minute against a bunch of part-timers.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Biff View Post
      I know our home form is cack but to play ONE striker upfront against a team of PART-TIMERS has me wondering the the f**k Rafa's playing at.

      By all means be cautious if we're playing the Manc's, Chav's or Arse but part-timers...??!??
      Watch the game again. Benni played up front with Crouch.
      The Crushing Machine MKII

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by bigfooty View Post
        Yes, because a scoring record of 3 goals in 4 games is reason to drop a striker.

        Let's pick Deadly Dirk instead!
        No the fact that he did nothing else, couldn't retain the ball, didn't attack any of the 10+ crosses put in, are good reasons for dropping a striker.
        The Crushing Machine MKII

        Comment

        Working...
        X