And this is from the Rangers forums :
Hicks fields a very average team, drastically cuts payroll, and annually raises ticket prices. Sounds like a good business model!
The Rangers have finished LAST or next to last for almost an entire decade now, yet attendance has actually been pretty good.
Attendance isn't a problem with the Rangers, never has been, and likely never will be.
"Removing Tom Hicks"
"I would be all for a strike/boycott of the Rangers until Hicks sold the team to get his sorry ass out of here and get us a real owner."
"I would agree that Ranger administration, if winning games is the object, has not done well over the last third of a century, or so. "
"How much better would those teams have been if they'd had access to more funding for starting pitching?"
"Since I'm as big a Liverpool FC fan as I am a Rangers fan, I couldn't be happier.
Hicks and Gillette are already becoming hated men in England"
"They want his personal cash over there. Is this why our Rangers always get the crumbs? Maybe someone should offer some money for the Rangers so he can keep Liverpool, or have the Liverpudlians already figured out that angle ALREADY!"
"I think if you look at what resources Hicks had, he may be the worst owner ever. "
Angry Rangers Fans
"there is frustration with losing and frustration of the Hicks tenure."
"I think most every Ranger fan has been disappointed in the on-field performance of this team for a number of years. "
I could go on for hours posting quotes like this from that one forum.
Feel free to bury your head in the sand, but I guarantee you this :
Hicks is only interested in making as much profit, with as little investment as possible.
Don't miss out on that 'as little investment as possible'.
He is not interested in on the pitch success.
Hicks fields a very average team, drastically cuts payroll, and annually raises ticket prices. Sounds like a good business model!
The Rangers have finished LAST or next to last for almost an entire decade now, yet attendance has actually been pretty good.
Attendance isn't a problem with the Rangers, never has been, and likely never will be.
"Removing Tom Hicks"
"I would be all for a strike/boycott of the Rangers until Hicks sold the team to get his sorry ass out of here and get us a real owner."
"I would agree that Ranger administration, if winning games is the object, has not done well over the last third of a century, or so. "
"How much better would those teams have been if they'd had access to more funding for starting pitching?"
"Since I'm as big a Liverpool FC fan as I am a Rangers fan, I couldn't be happier.
Hicks and Gillette are already becoming hated men in England"
"They want his personal cash over there. Is this why our Rangers always get the crumbs? Maybe someone should offer some money for the Rangers so he can keep Liverpool, or have the Liverpudlians already figured out that angle ALREADY!"
"I think if you look at what resources Hicks had, he may be the worst owner ever. "
Angry Rangers Fans
"there is frustration with losing and frustration of the Hicks tenure."
"I think most every Ranger fan has been disappointed in the on-field performance of this team for a number of years. "
I could go on for hours posting quotes like this from that one forum.
Feel free to bury your head in the sand, but I guarantee you this :
Hicks is only interested in making as much profit, with as little investment as possible.
Don't miss out on that 'as little investment as possible'.
He is not interested in on the pitch success.
Comment