Hicks is the better of the two (G & H that is) and the reason why Rafa has not had the kind of money that was promised him, is because of Gillets reluctance to put any of his own money in.
What if Hicks has been the one trying to get this to work, hence the reason why Hicks might stay on in some sort of capacity after DIC take over (if rumours are to be believed.)
What if we are slagging off the wrong person when it comes to the financial situation we now find the club in, and the reason for all the rest of the ****e was not solely down to Hicks, but it being laid at the feet of Gillet in stead?.
What if we are slagging off Hicks for coming out and saying what he has said in the press (regards klinsmann etc.. ) because he's the only one out of the two with the balls to tell it like it is, and did not want people to think it was all down to himself?.
Just a few things to think about when/if any thing happens over the next week or two.
What if Hicks has been the one trying to get this to work, hence the reason why Hicks might stay on in some sort of capacity after DIC take over (if rumours are to be believed.)
What if we are slagging off the wrong person when it comes to the financial situation we now find the club in, and the reason for all the rest of the ****e was not solely down to Hicks, but it being laid at the feet of Gillet in stead?.
What if we are slagging off Hicks for coming out and saying what he has said in the press (regards klinsmann etc.. ) because he's the only one out of the two with the balls to tell it like it is, and did not want people to think it was all down to himself?.
Just a few things to think about when/if any thing happens over the next week or two.

Comment