Originally posted by Bob
I've always like bananas and McManaman for that very reason 
-
Excellent sir.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
Marvellous. I have seen some people write "pyjamas" as "pajamas" but I don't think that's acceptable. "Bananarama in pajamas" would be good though. Better than boilersuits anyway.Originally posted by Red_PoloBananarama
Whoah I'm way off at a tangent now..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
The boy had a half-and-half style pair of Bananarama-Galatasaray pajamas. How's that?Originally posted by Neil YoungLike blood on ironComment
-
Were they the Dalai Lama's Bananarama-Galatasaray pajamas?Originally posted by Red_Polo.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
TaramasalataI live with Steptoe.Comment
-
No, I think they were Maharaja's. And Mums may well be right, I seem to remember they did have a taramasalata stain on.Originally posted by Neil YoungLike blood on ironComment
-
Yes, I remember now. I'd forgotten all about that saga in the Sahara with Sara, Dara and Dana. And Rafa.Originally posted by Red_Polo
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
LOL this has gone too farOriginally posted by Neil YoungYes, I remember now. I'd forgotten all about that saga in the Sahara with Sara, Dara and Dana. And Rafa.
Like blood on ironComment
-
Nerds! Neeeeerrrrdddddssss!!!
Just when I discovered the meaning of life, they changed itComment
-
Well, i was referring to the actual goals. They were both scored because of the bad positioning/marking by our Centre halfs IMO.Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
Sissoko is a big part of our defending. He isn’t a holding midfielder who sits in front of the back four, sure, but he is crucial to our defending by the way he presses all over the park and wins the ball back for us time and time again. It had everything to do with his absence.
Admittedly, in the overall scheme of things, if Sissoko was there, Galatasary wouldn't have had the possession they did...Comment
-
I used to love 'em...Originally posted by GrouchoNerds! Neeeeerrrrdddddssss!!!
Like blood on ironComment
-
Originally posted by Nic-Flush83
Yes.
People keep blathering on about Garcia and Aurelio getting totally exposed on the left (which they were), but the ball has to ****ing get there in the first place. A lot of balls were received wide right (our left) because the centre of our midfield was empty. They were given far too much time to spray the ball out wide and that wouldn't have happened with Momo getting in people's faces.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
Comment