Rafa Benitez issues Liverpool FC warning

[Migselv]

These debates are had on every LFC forum currently - there is a massive pro and anti Rafa agenda on every forum at the moment. It's reflective of the current fan view.

Ofc there is, and rightly so I think. The point is that it should be kept in the appropriate threads, and not be brought into any thread.
Btw. this site used to be one of the better sites because of the general standard of the discussions, that's why I posted what I did.

[Rashid]

This thread is about Rafa isn't it?

[Pacman]

This thread is about Rafa isn't it?

Yep but about his comments in the press about City NOT about the life and times of Rafa at LFC.

[Migselv]

Rashid ! I'm not gonna let myself be dragged into a long discussion with you, because my lurking has taught me that you won't budge anyway.
But since you ask, i'll answer your question as I see it. This thread is about Rafa to some extent yes. But it's supposed to be about the interview he gave IMO. The natural thing would be to discuss what he say's, why he say's it and so on. But most of this thread - again - ended up being pro/anti Rafa.
Rafa is the manager of LFC, so basically everything concerning LFC could be turned into a Pro/anti rafa debate. IMO the site would benefit, if some posters showed a bit more maturity and restrained themselves from bringing their Pro/Anti rafa views into every thread.

[Rashid]

The interview was about transfer spending, and that's all that's been discussed by people unless I have missed something.

[Manofthebog]

One thing at a time young jedi.

Get the cancer that is twit and **** out of our club , first, second, and nothing else, then, and only then, discuss Rafa.

More fudging important issues than whether Rafa has/hasn't performed well with his transfer policy.

People do like to take their eyes off the ball.

[ronniedrew]

Would rather have kept Baros than buy Kuyt.

ill know how to take your views on football matters from now on, with a pinch, nay, a spoon full of salt

[Migselv]

The interview was about transfer spending, and that's all that's been discussed by people unless I have missed something.

You are missing something then. Or rather: you are missing something on purpose. Surely you are aware that you have only commented on Rafas transfer dealings negatively, using it as arguments as to why he isn't what LFC need.
The very fact that you can even pretend to not be aware of this, is what I personally find immature, and it makes any sort of discussion with you futile.
Over and out from me...back to lurking..

[Skillz]

One thing at a time young jedi.

Get the cancer that is twit and **** out of our club , first, second, and nothing else, then, and only then, discuss Rafa.

More fudging important issues than whether Rafa has/hasn't performed well with his transfer policy.

People do like to take their eyes off the ball.

Well said, it is a very valid point.

[FatTony]

This is the last news story I'm posting

[Guest]

cant believe this cunting thread is still going

I bet they wouldn't be happy if I start chipping in.

[Pacman]

This is the last news story I'm posting

[Johnny]

Both Rafa threads have run their course.4/5 posters don`t think much of Rafa.

[Redlife]

One thing at a time young jedi.

Get the cancer that is twit and **** out of our club , first, second, and nothing else, then, and only then, discuss Rafa.

More fudging important issues than whether Rafa has/hasn't performed well with his transfer policy.

People do like to take their eyes off the ball.

[-V-]

Why? Baros would probably have been better than Kuyt is out wide. I don't need help mate. I'm not the one playing a striker on the wing like Football Manager

Thats just going too far. Baros has been a failure for the last 4 years. He has done nothing and been shipped off left right and centre because of his failure.

Kuyt on the other hand is a bloody good tea player and consistently one of our top scorers in the CL