Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scott Parker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Scott Parker

    i know we have momo , but would have really liked lfc to have had this guy in our side, an unassuming hard working defensive midfielder that would have replaced the departure of the great Didi hamman, and all you veterans of kt would have read threads of the player allegedly wanting to join us over the last year (OK that was duncspeak) but still think he would have been a great asset,anyway made up he has had an england call up.

    #2
    Yep me too, not sure how many games he'd get for us, but I think he would have been a welcome addition to our central midfield, in place of Zenden.
    Thomas Hicks Senior

    Comment


      #3
      I really like Parker. I was surprised Utd didn't go for him instead of Carrick. He would have been a good addition to our sqaud. Trouble is he cost plenty & Zenden was a free.
      AKA Heighway No9

      Comment


        #4
        Do you think the chavs would have dealt with us?

        And, iirc, didn't we try when he was at Charlton?
        http://www.retroreds.co.uk/

        Comment


          #5
          Eh! I don't like Parker. His face is just asking to be bashed. But credit to him, he dives very good. When Garcia's shot hit him in the hand (and we should have a free-kick, but refferees at Anfield are partly or 100% blind, methinks), he fell down and faked as if the ball hit him directly in the face. He even got up and was looking if he was bleeding from his nose. ****in ****! :whatever:
          Torres Fan Club Member #2, Lucas Leiva Fan Club Member #1

          going limp; HARRRRRRRRRRRR

          Comment


            #6
            He's overrated IMO. There is a reason he didn't make it at Chelsea and Utd and others didn't go for him. He doesn't cut it against good opponents. Good enough for an England back-up though.

            You're right, cobain, he cheated against us (something which that fool Marwood wilfully omitted to mention).
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              #7
              Didn't like him to be honest but he has won me over based on his perfs for the barcodes recently. The captains armband clearly has transformed the lad.

              Comment

              Working...
              X