Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafa has REALLY got under Ferguson's skin!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
    Aye, the Scum in my office are gonna be getting that in their inbox tomorrow & songs of "Fergie's cracking up" too.

    Comment


      #77
      I agree - this Tomkins article is worthy of its own thread.

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by wiw View Post
        Everyone should read that Tomkins article
        Does it match upto the usual standard of a Tomkins article?

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
          Does it match upto the usual standard of a Tomkins article?
          Why, he's too positive and supporting for your liking?

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
            Does it match upto the usual standard of a Tomkins article?
            it just states the facts as always, in a nutshell.....Rafa is doing a fantastic job
            _____________________________________

            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

            Comment


              #81
              Sorry but anyone now trying to argue Rafa is doing anything other than a fantastic job is either demented or just plain hates him.
              Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

              Comment


                #82
                Rafa is the ****ing man!!!!

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by pondus View Post
                  Why, he's too positive and supporting for your liking?
                  Seriously mate, dont question my support - you have literally no idea.

                  I genuinely struggle to take him seriously because he literally puts a positive spin on EVERY SINGLE THING that happens.

                  "Gerrard has a hamstring injury, but if you think about it, this is actually a good thing because zzzz...."

                  I think he lacks any real credibility, not because he's positive, but because there's never any balance to his articles and by the very nature of life, nothing is ever 'perfect' but he never acknowledges anything BUT the positives.

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                    Seriously mate, dont question my support - you have literally no idea.

                    I genuinely struggle to take him seriously because he literally puts a positive spin on EVERY SINGLE THING that happens.

                    "Gerrard has a hamstring injury, but if you think about it, this is actually a good thing because zzzz...."


                    I think he lacks any real credibility, not because he's positive, but because there's never any balance to his articles and by the very nature of life, nothing is ever 'perfect' but he never acknowledges anything BUT the positives.
                    "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                      Does it match upto the usual standard of a Tomkins article?
                      Just read it ffs
                      Sack swinging like Dub-D40 on a door hinge

                      Comment


                        #86
                        Originally posted by wiw View Post
                        Just read it ffs
                        Bog off

                        I'll read it when i have some energy.

                        Comment


                          #87
                          It's actually pretty concise for a Tomkins article and for once his over enthusiasm is warranted
                          'Religion is killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend'

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                            Seriously mate, dont question my support - you have literally no idea.

                            I genuinely struggle to take him seriously because he literally puts a positive spin on EVERY SINGLE THING that happens.

                            "Gerrard has a hamstring injury, but if you think about it, this is actually a good thing because zzzz...."

                            I think he lacks any real credibility, not because he's positive, but because there's never any balance to his articles and by the very nature of life, nothing is ever 'perfect' but he never acknowledges anything BUT the positives.

                            its the same way i feel about some of the negative posters on here and isnt it great to read positively abiut our club and not negatively?
                            _____________________________________

                            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

                            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Originally posted by red g View Post
                              its the same way i feel about some of the negative posters on here and isnt it great to read positively abiut our club and not negatively?
                              It still requires some kind of credibility. After all, this chap is paid for his musings. Not quite sure why, but it's the stuff of toddlers, at times. When posters on here are paid for their opinion, then there might be a genuine case for them to contain more responsibility.

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                                It still requires some kind of credibility. After all, this chap is paid for his musings. Not quite sure why, but it's the stuff of toddlers, at times. When posters on here are paid for their opinion, then there might be a genuine case for them to contain more responsibility.
                                An opinion on everything and insight on nothing.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X