It is still very very much on!

[Craig_H]

So you're saying, one should maintain the same view of a club's potential fortunes, whether they win 10 in a row or lose 10 in a row. Because that would be sensible?

Right oh.

[Skillz]

So you're saying, one should maintain the same view of a club's potential fortunes, whether they win 10 in a row or lose 10 in a row. Because that would be sensible?

Right oh.

You don't get it do you. You can form what ever opinion you like mate, that's your choice and it's valid. Some one else can form a different opinion, which is also just as valid.

It's not however due to thier 'mental tendacies' like you suggested which IMO makes you come across as an arrogant prick with an inflated opinion in your own opinion.

Can't spell it out much more than that.

[Craig_H]

You don't get it do you. You can form what ever opinion you like mate, that's your choice and it's valid. Some one else can form a different opinion, which is also just as valid.

It's not however due to thier 'mental tendacies' like you suggested which IMO makes you come across as an arrogant prick with an inflated opinion in your own opinion.

Can't spell it out much more than that.

Why are you putting the words 'mental tendencies' (I assume that's what you meant, as 'tendacies' isn't a word) in quote marks, as if to imply that I said those words? Because i didnt.

So in truth, you're quoting me on something I didnt say, which is what an ignorant prick with a lack of education, might do. Along with mis-spelling tendencies. So no, you can't spell it out much more than that. Or, even just spell it, at all, for that matter. Same can be said for 'thier'.

[Craig_H]

For what it's worth, my opinion 'floats in the wind like a kite' because, as i implied, one would be foolish to maintain the same opinion, regardless of significant amounts of evidence to the contrary. So in reality, an opinion which is based on the evidence that is available, is far more considered and rational than one which ignores all of the evidence.

[Skillz]

Why are you putting the words 'mental tendencies' (I assume that's what you meant, as 'tendacies' isn't a word) in quote marks, as if to imply that I said those words? Because i didnt.

So in truth, you're quoting me on something I didnt say, which is what an ignorant prick with a lack of education, might do. Along with mis-spelling tendencies. So no, you can't spell it out much more than that. Or, even just spell it, at all, for that matter. Same can be said for 'thier'.

For what it's worth, my opinion 'floats in the wind like a kite' because, as i implied, one would be foolish to maintain the same opinion, regardless of significant amounts of evidence to the contrary. So in reality, an opinion which is based on the evidence that is available, is far more considered and rational than one which ignores all of the evidence.

Excellant, your resorting to pointing out my spelling errors and questioning my intelligence. You still seem to have an inflated opinion in your own opinion though I see.

[Nicey]

bit harsh fella
i think craig like so many wants rafa to succeed so it dont make him a cunt for thinking he wont
we were 5 points clear and blew the league this year - tha tis the main problem - if we had been behind and come with a rattle to finish 2nd then thats different
this is the season we blew the league the mancs didnt win it (artisitc license)
imo

http://uk.wrs.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0S0zu6agPJJfr8ADCpWBQx./SIG=1246k3aa2/EXP=1240715802/**http%3A//www.pinknews.co.uk/images/gaywedding2.jpg

[Craig_H]

Excellant, your resorting to pointing out my spelling errors and questioning my intelligence. You still seem to have an inflated opinion in your own opinion though I see.

Your opinion is that i was an arrogant prick - mine is that you're an ignorant and uneducated prick.

Opinions, eh? We're all entitled.

No inflated opinion, just pointing out that to maintain a view, despite all contrary evidence, would be foolish. Or do you disagree?

If your opinion was that a team scores a prolific amount of goals and is very strong going forward, yet they went 10 games without scoring a goal, would you maintain that view? You'd be a bit silly to, when all evidence refutes it.

[Skillz]

Your opinion is that i was an arrogant prick - mine is that you're an ignorant and uneducated prick.

Opinions, eh? We're all entitled.

No inflated opinion, just pointing out that to maintain a view, despite all contrary evidence, would be foolish. Or do you disagree?

If your opinion was that a team scores a prolific amount of goals and is very strong going forward, yet they went 10 games without scoring a goal, would you maintain that view? You'd be a bit silly to, when all evidence refutes it.

Firstly, when we go 10 games without a goal PM me and I'll give you my opinion.

Secondly, we all get pissed off when we dont get the results we want some of us do not just blame the manager willy nilly because of various reasons, many of which we cannot know. Others post opinions laying blame left right and centre usualy towards the manager. Then of course there's you who not only posts his opinion, but does it repeatedly, again and again and again, only to change it again after a few decent results. That's ok also, even though it's annoying as ****.

Thirdly, only you seem to think it's ok to suggest others that do not share the same opinion have "mental tendencies". Spare me please.

[Vermilion]

http://uk.wrs.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0S0zu6...aywedding2.jpg

a picture says so much, that words cannot convey, but in this case..you could have just called them gay.

i'm a poet and i didn't know either.

[squaddie]

Didnt you's guys have anything better to do at 3:00AM?......... Like sleeping or havin a bash or sumthin?

[Craig_H]

Firstly, when we go 10 games without a goal PM me and I'll give you my opinion.

Secondly, we all get pissed off when we dont get the results we want some of us do not just blame the manager willy nilly because of various reasons, many of which we cannot know. Others post opinions laying blame left right and centre usualy towards the manager. Then of course there's you who not only posts his opinion, but does it repeatedly, again and again and again, only to change it again after a few decent results. That's ok also, even though it's annoying as ****.

Thirdly, only you seem to think it's ok to suggest others that do not share the same opinion have "mental tendencies". Spare me please.

Firstly, i wasnt talking about us, it was a general point. Which you obviously agree with, but dont want to.

Secondly - again, go and find me some quotes where i've blamed the manager or even been criticial of the players of late. Yet again, you're making idiotic accusations which you cant back up. It is, to coin a phrase, 'annoying as ****'.

Thirdly, where the **** did i even mention 'mental tendencies'. You're making things up again, which i never even said. Bizarre weirdness.

Fourthly, when you called Gerrard **** the other day, you were talking bollocks.

[Skillz]

Firstly, i wasnt talking about us, it was a general point. Which you obviously agree with, but dont want to.

Secondly - again, go and find me some quotes where i've blamed the manager or even been criticial of the players of late. Yet again, you're making idiotic accusations which you cant back up. It is, to coin a phrase, 'annoying as ****'.

Thirdly, where the **** did i even mention 'mental tendencies'. You're making things up again, which i never even said. Bizarre weirdness.

Fourthly, when you called Gerrard **** the other day, you were talking bollocks.

If there was one thing i didnt think i could be accused of, it's following the masses. Maybe the masses on here just have slightly more mental tendencies

and when did I call Gerrard ****?

[Craig_H]

and when did I call Gerrard ****?

Oh right, your evidence was a post where i was laughing and sharing a joke with Danny? Good stuff.

[Skillz]

Oh right, your evidence was a post where i was laughing and sharing a joke with Danny? Good stuff.

It's still evidence. Where's yours?

[Craig_H]

It's still evidence. Where's yours?

A post where i'm clearly joking, is evidence? Hamshanks predicts us to lose 3-0 every game - does that mean he thinks we're ****?

If i ever faced anyone in court, i hope you're their lawyer.