Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sensational Youtube Glen Johnson video

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by tommyg View Post
    After that video all i hope is that he's as fast running back to defend! Also dont know why the maker didnt slow mo the clearance off the line instead of him shooting it into the crossbar lol
    In that video, he was playing RW in some of those games.
    My kebab comes with chilli sauce

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by saj View Post
      You can't question his attacking abilities. That's one of the reasons why Portsmouth used him as a winger towards the end of the season. In fact in that clip, he has 5 shots on goal in a match against tottenham (I think) - in that game he was used as a winger. He's not great defensively, but in a team like Liverpool he'll be OK as he'll have enough protection from the likes of Kuyt and Mascher (if he doesn't leave). I can guarentee personally he'll be a success at Liverpool - my track record speaks for itself. I've previously said that Torres would be a flop and Mark Gonzalez would go on to be one of the best wingers in Europe.


      When first reading that I thought 'he's a bit sure of himself' then got to the last bit.

      Personally i think he'll be a great success for us. We've needed an attacking right full back for some time now. Delighted with our first piece of business.
      'Religion is killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend'

      Comment


        #18
        Obviously everyone looks good on Youtube but I never realised he was that attack minded. Looks very quick and very strong - has a good left foot too. Though could've done better with some of his efforts on goal

        Needs to sort his hair out. We've enough dodgy 'dos here

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Levi View Post
          Obviously everyone looks good on Youtube but I never realised he was that attack minded. Looks very quick and very strong - has a good left foot too. Though could've done better with some of his efforts on goal

          Needs to sort his hair out. We've enough dodgy 'dos here
          Stig Inge Bjornebye was also very attack minded. Search for him on youtube and watch his compilation videos.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by fredo View Post
            Stig Inge Bjornebye was also very attack minded. Search for him on youtube and watch his compilation videos.
            What's your point?

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Levi View Post
              What's your point?
              That you can show whatever you want in a short youtube clip. You normally will see the flashier side of a player. Nobody cares about tackles and the likes.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Levi View Post
                What's your point?
                Originally posted by fredo View Post
                That you can show whatever you want in a short youtube clip. You normally will see the flashier side of a player. Nobody cares about tackles and the likes.
                I think he meant it in existential terms, as in, "what's the point of you?" It's a very good question.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  I think he meant it in existential terms, as in, "what's the point of you?" It's a very good question.
                  But in existential terms, if there's 'no point in me' why should people bother replying to voids ... vacuums or whatever?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by fredo View Post
                    But in existential terms, if there's 'no point in me' why should people bother replying to voids ... vacuums or whatever?
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      You still hit that submit reply Doggie. Epic fail again.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by fredo View Post
                        You still hit that submit reply Doggie. Epic fail again.
                        Whooosh.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by fredo View Post
                          That you can show whatever you want in a short youtube clip. You normally will see the flashier side of a player. Nobody cares about tackles and the likes.
                          Well yeah, I know that - and everyone knows that - fool. That wasn't the point I was making.

                          I see no need to compare him with Stig Inge Bjornebye when you could've just said 'Everyone looks good on Youtube etc etc etc'.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by fredo View Post
                            You still hit that submit reply Doggie. Epic fail again.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Levi View Post
                              Well yeah, I know that - and everyone knows that - fool. That wasn't the point I was making.

                              I see no need to compare him with Stig Inge Bjornebye when you could've just said 'Everyone looks good on Youtube etc etc etc'.
                              Stig Inge was a cult hero, so why not? Fool.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by fredo View Post
                                Stig Inge was a cult hero, so why not? Fool.
                                Why have you started signing your posts? Neil
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X