Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transfer Kitty??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Transfer Kitty??

    heres abit from the mirror. sounds quite worrying. looks like our yank friends have paid the banks off with the transfer budget

    Liverpool need new blood to challenge for title

    It was only a friendly, and in the great scheme of things this match means less than zero.

    Yet the look in Rafael Benitez's eye afterwards, as he cautiously fielded questions about his summer transfer spending, suggested that more significant issues were raised at Anfield on Saturday than mere defeat to middling Spanish opposition.

    The Liverpool boss watched in horror as Jamie Carragher, his only fit senior defender, inevitably limped out of the game after just 14 minutes, with a twisted ankle that required a scan yesterday afternoon.

    The prognosis is not serious, but still the Reds will have to wait until at least Wednesday for the swelling to go down to get a clear idea of whether their stalwart will be fit for the opening day of the season.

    But with Benitez's two other centre-halves Martin Skrtel and Daniel Agger both in a race against time to shake off injuries - and with both clearly far from match fit after missing big chunks of pre-season - it raises the immediate question of resources at Anfield.

    It is clear the Merseyside club require a fourth centre-half after the departure of Sami Hyypia in the summer, and yet it is equally clear that there is no money to buy one.

    That is a painful situation for Benitez, because he has made a profit in the transfer market this summer, and rightly would expect to reinvest that money generated.

    Indeed, when renegotiating his new contract last April, one of the key elements before the Spaniard put pen to paper on a five-year deal was the availability of funds to make the significant signings this summer he felt were required to finally bring the title to Anfield after a wait of 20 years.

    At the time, the club's American owners let it be known there was £40million to spend, plus anything Benitez raised in sales. Instead, he has not even been able to spend everything he raised, and the £40m has gone to the banks to reduce debt and secure a refinancing deal.

    It is a difficult situation for the manager because he knows he is so close to a title-winning side, perhaps on two or three quality players away.

    But his dealings this week will be revealing. It is clear the Anfield boss will try to sign a centre-half, and he revealed at the weekend that he has already been in talks with Phil Brown over Hull's Michael Turner.

    Yet he also indicated almost as clearly that he simply doesn't have the funds to meet the £11m asking price, and will instead have to shop in the bargain basement, represented by the £3m rated Portsmouth defender Sylvain Distin.

    Benitez tried to make light of the situation after the defeat by Atletico Madrid, but it is clear that the financial crisis at Anfield is a huge problem for him...and the club's prospects.

    "We were supposed to have some money but I will not talk about figures. On the record or off the record when you talk about figures I think it is clear. I will not say anything. I don't have the answer," Benitez explained.

    "We just have to manage with the players we have, and we will try to be ready just in case we can sign someone, but you never know. It depends on the prices."

    Despite his caution, Benitez there was clearly revealing his frustration at the lack of funds available, and he even admitted that he is in talks with the owners over simply getting the money to spend he has raised through selling players this summer.

    So far, he has no indication that the money will be made available, hence his talk about making do with the players he already has.

    It is a desperate situation for Liverpool, who were in their best position for 20 years as genuine title contenders, and yet face going into the season with a smaller, less well-equipped squad than last season when they finished second.

    Liverpool's poor pre-season results have illustrated the problems Benitez faces, and not least here, with Atletico's top class strike duo Kun Aguero and Diego Forlan getting a goal apiece as they exploited the inexperience of teenage centre-half pairing Danny Ayala and Mikel San Jose.

    But at least there were some positives. Fernando Torres appeared to pull up in the second half with a hamstring problem, but afterwards Benitez insisted it was not serious, and probably just a minor ankle problem.

    He also stated that he was 80 per cent confident that two of Carragher, Agger and Skrtel will be available for the opening day game against Spurs and the peculiar threat Peter Crouch will pose.

    Torres looked far from match fit in this game, but he still could have scored three or four, and as he gets into the swing of the season will surely again be a devastating threat for Liverpool.

    Lucas too, showed that he can fill the gap left by Xabi Alonso's departure and the two-month injury lay-off for new signing Alberto Aquliani, with a good late goal and an energetic attacking display from midfield.

    But perhaps the most important indicator of how Liverpool will fare this season - and perhaps over the next few years - will come in the transfer market this week. If Benitez has no funds to make the signings he needs, then it could be a long, hard season.


    #2
    It's obvious what's happened. We had about £20m or so to spend. We sold close to £40m worth of players. And the owners have paid £60m to the banks.

    Doesnt take Carol Vorderman to work out where the £60m came from.

    Comment


      #3
      Depressing stuff. We are so close as well and yet we can't strengthen and take advantage of the Scums weakness

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by -V- View Post
        Depressing stuff. We are so close as well and yet we can't strengthen and take advantage of the Scums weakness
        It sure is.
        Substance > Style

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
          It's obvious what's happened. We had about £20m or so to spend. We sold close to £40m worth of players. And the owners have paid £60m to the banks.

          Doesnt take Carol Vorderman to work out where the £60m came from.
          Originally posted by -V- View Post
          Depressing stuff. We are so close as well and yet we can't strengthen and take advantage of the Scums weakness
          All true. And yet the pundits sit in their ivory towers and state that Beintez "Has no more excuses". I wish he ****ing didn't. But lets face it, he has yet another.

          Rafa clearly knows he needs to spend cash on a few positions, but he hasn't got the funds to do this. We will once again be spending another season hoping our key players stay injury free and we will have to see where this takes us.

          I think our one saving grace has been that of our rivals, only Man City have improved their squad, the rest have gone backwards. Man Utd have lost Tevez and Ronaldo, Arsenal Toure and Adebayor, whilst Chelsea have lost Guus Hiddink.
          Forwards.......

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by DannyMan2006 View Post
            All true. And yet the pundits sit in their ivory towers and state that Beintez "Has no more excuses". I wish he ****ing didn't. But lets face it, he has yet another.

            Rafa clearly knows he needs to spend cash on a few positions, but he hasn't got the funds to do this. We will once again be spending another season hoping our key players stay injury free and we will have to see where this takes us.

            I think our one saving grace has been that of our rivals, only Man City have improved their squad, the rest have gone backwards. Man Utd have lost Tevez and Ronaldo, Arsenal Toure and Adebayor, whilst Chelsea have lost Guus Hiddink
            .
            This certainly evens things up a bit, on paper at least.

            That was such a key issue, in that all of the others had lost crucial factors to their chances of success, and yet we hadnt. We were looking in prime position to creep up on the inside and turn it to our advantage. Then Alonso had to go and spit the dummy

            So frustrating.

            Comment


              #7
              Just one thing i forgot though - didnt george g sell one of his american sports franchises?

              Shouldnt that have helped fund the £60m payment to the banks? Why did it have to come out of our transfer budget?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                Just one thing i forgot though - didnt george g sell one of his american sports franchises?

                Shouldnt that have helped fund the £60m payment to the banks? Why did it have to come out of our transfer budget?
                Well we don't know if it has or not, we only have a newspaper article to say what is going on and they are not exactly the best sources.
                www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                  Just one thing i forgot though - didnt george g sell one of his american sports franchises?

                  Shouldnt that have helped fund the £60m payment to the banks? Why did it have to come out of our transfer budget?
                  Like Mattshark say's we only have newspapers to quote from but.

                  But it would have been unlikely george would have ploughed his money in for the benefit of Hicks too. As it is a 50/50 split, Hicks would have had to pour in at least 30m off his own money and as of this moment I am not aware of him selling any of this sports franchises..

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                    Just one thing i forgot though - didnt george g sell one of his american sports franchises?

                    Shouldnt that have helped fund the £60m payment to the banks? Why did it have to come out of our transfer budget?
                    Because he is not the sole owner.

                    Had Hicks also come across a cash windfall maybe they could have pumped in £100m each (dreamer) but with only one hitting the jackpot this was never gonna happen.
                    Forwards.......

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                      Just one thing i forgot though - didnt george g sell one of his american sports franchises?

                      Shouldnt that have helped fund the £60m payment to the banks? Why did it have to come out of our transfer budget?
                      He needed more gold back scratchers
                      James Philip Milner Fanclub #1

                      Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by DannyMan2006 View Post
                        Because he is not the sole owner.

                        Had Hicks also come across a cash windfall maybe they could have pumped in £100m each (dreamer) but with only one hitting the jackpot this was never gonna happen.
                        Was going to post exactly this. Its of no real benefit that one equal partner has more available funds than the other, unless it was to increase his stake

                        That piece makes for pretty depressing reading, not the piece itself but the quotes from Benitez

                        Of course its written that way on purpose, ie to sell papers, so we shouldn't slit our collective e-wrists just yet, but its not pleasant at all

                        There is still a lot of the transfer window left, we may yet pull a signing out of the bag

                        Those of us hoping for Villa/Aguero/A.N.Other (I do include myself) are likely to be dissapointed, but thats not to say there is categorically no new signings. Knowing Benitez, he wouldn't say "Yeah we've got another couple before the end of August" anyway, even if it were true

                        Still
                        I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
                        There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Fierce View Post
                          There is still a lot of the transfer window left, we may yet pull a signing out of the bag

                          Those of us hoping for Villa/Aguero/A.N.Other (I do include myself) are likely to be dissapointed, but thats not to say there is categorically no new signings. Knowing Benitez, he wouldn't say "Yeah we've got another couple before the end of August" anyway, even if it were true

                          Still
                          Don't get me wrong, I am actually quite certain we will make two more signings. I just think we could have brought in some real extra quality, which we will not do.
                          Forwards.......

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                            It's obvious what's happened. We had about £20m or so to spend. We sold close to £40m worth of players. And the owners have paid £60m to the banks.

                            Doesnt take Carol Vorderman to work out where the £60m came from.
                            Only £40m has been paid with £20m to be paid at a later date, probably when we sell Masch to Barcelona. Why people thought the owners were putting money in themselves is a mystery to me, they have never put in their own money yet and they never will.
                            Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - Sessegnon

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Do G&H actually own anything. It's all borrowed money.

                              When they "sell" any of their American franchises - I would guess after paying back the loans, they end up with a Kit Kat and a cup of coffee.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X