It's just he's not as good as the real thing. We all know that. I'm sure he'd admit it himself.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Great use of the word 'baloney' by the real Pablo as well.
The 1981 version seems far more resticted in his vocabulary.
It's that kind of difference that makes you realise he's not just own label, he's the "value" version.
Last edited by Neil Young; 14-09-10, 03:48 PM.
Reason: Unnecessary repetition of anti-ownlabelPablo sentiments
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
I've often considered him similar to those cheap knock-off "designer" handbags you get it foreign airports- inoffensive and does a job, but look closely and there's a real dearth of quality...
Comment