Manchester United vs Liverpool match thread

[Bender]

No your opinion isn't honest because if it were you would have seen there wasn't any penalty.

i swear your mental with the stuff you come out with ......you know for someone so pro liverpool/Rafa am amazed you went for a utd win ......can i borrow your rafa tinted glasses and your i love rafa hat

[Bender]

What the **** I'm on about? Watch the replay or put your binoculars on. The foul was committed at least 4 metres outside the penalty box.

let me guess you used a ruler on the tv

[Exiled_red]

Pardon my ignorance, but is the freekick supposed to be from where the original contact was made?

The freekick should be where the foul is committed, i.e. where contact is made, if shirt pulling occurs over a distance I suppose that's up to the referee to define where on the run the foul actually occured. The freekick could have been given anywhere between the initial and final contact (I guess at the closest point to the goal to give the attacking team the advantage). But there was no contact inside the box, so it wasn't a penalty

[Guest]

For the record I think it was a very close one to call from being outside or inside the area. Could have gone either way in my opinion.

Mascher was all over him well before he reached the penalty area. If he gives advantage and Valencia falls inside the box he should go back to where the foul was first committed, as it makes no sense to give a penalty. This is a nonsensical decision, I'm sorry. Never in a million years that was a peno.

[BobTheCharmer]

What the **** I'm on about? Watch the replay or put your binoculars on. The foul was committed at least 4 metres outside the penalty box.

I said I thought it was outside but as he kept on his feet and fell in the box it was given. I've seen ****ing **** loads of similar decisions over the years. You can't honestly claim it was the worst penalty ever seen unless my friend you're an idiot. You'd argue black was white.

[Reece]

The freekick should be where the foul is committed, i.e. where contact is made, if shirt pulling occurs over a distance I suppose that's up to the referee to define where on the run the foul actually occured. The freekick could have been given anywhere between the initial and final contact (I guess at the closest point to the goal to give the attacking team the advantage). But there was no contact inside the box, so it wasn't a penalty

Mascher was all over him well before he reached the penalty area. If he gives advantage and Valencia falls inside the box he should go back to where the foul was first committed, as it makes no sense to give a penalty. This is a nonsensical decision, I'm sorry. Never in a million years that was a peno.

Yeah that's the one thing I'm not sure on the rule on - when the foul continues into the penalty are does the ref have to take it back to where it started? I don't know. And it also depends at which point the ref deemed Mascherano to have actually committed the foul - we just don't know.

[wiw]

The freekick should be where the foul is committed, i.e. where contact is made, if shirt pulling occurs over a distance I suppose that's up to the referee to define where on the run the foul actually occured. The freekick could have been given anywhere between the initial and final contact (I guess at the closest point to the goal to give the attacking team the advantage). But there was no contact inside the box, so it wasn't a penalty

Ok Well, yeah, the contact was outside the box and then Valencia just fell over

[Guest]

I said I thought it was outside but as he kept on his feet and fell in the box it was given. I've seen ****ing **** loads of similar decisions over the years. You can't honestly claim it was the worst penalty ever seen unless my friend you're an idiot. You'd argue black was white.

You're a moron. Waste of time to be arguing with you.

[Reece]

****ing hell cut it out you two.

[BobTheCharmer]

You're a moron. Waste of time to be arguing with you.

and there was me thinking the exact same of you.

[BobTheCharmer]

****ing hell cut it out you two.

but the guy is a first class WUM.

[Assassin]

Contact was outside of the box, it should have been no more than a freekick.

Valencia should have been booked for blatantly diving

The linesman flagged after Webb had incorrectly blown for a penalty

Webb will be receiving a large sum of unmarked notes from Mr in the not too distant future

Ratcunt is a cunt

Ferguson is a condom chewing ****

We are royally ****ed and have been since early November

Another bad day alround, apart slipping the missus a crippler this morning before we got out of bed

[Leyton388]

10 league losses this season says it all. We are a mid table team.

[Exiled_red]

Yeah that's the one thing I'm not sure on the rule on - when the foul continues into the penalty are does the ref have to take it back to where it started? I don't know. And it also depends at which point the ref deemed Mascherano to have actually committed the foul - we just don't know.

I think if there is constant contact outside and continued contact inside the box, the ref is likely to give a penalty. Although I guess the going down under the challenge is likely to occur inside the box.

[Woobus]

Webb will be receiving a large sum of unmarked notes from Mr in the not too distant future

The drunk **** will just suck him off there will be no money changing hands only bodily fluids.