Originally posted by Exiled_red
View Post
A lot of the players we've sold on have been average reserve/or squad fillers, Voronin, Kronkamp, Guthrie, Pennant, Hobbs etc we've made money on all these. That money has partly helped to make Rafa's Transfer Spend 'Net' over the period. Without this money coming back in the figures would look an awful lot worse. Surely there's nothing wrong in doing this? Balancing the books by selling on players of little use.
Now this probably couldn't/wouldn't happen but if we were to sell off 10 reserve players a year out of the hundreds we seemingly have on the books, this could bring in say £20m. If Rafa was given that £20m to spend each year would that be acceptable? Or as its a zero net spend would he still have to be given more on top before people stop staying he has no money?
The £30m figure we got from Alonso also heavily sways the transfer spend to the mythical zero net figure that is bandied around. If he was still here and we hadn't cashed in due to him wanting out, the only net we'd be talking about is the one we hopefully put the ****ing ball in on a regular basis against inferior opposition.
RAFA 
Comment