Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafa vs. Roy or...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Rafa vs. Roy or...

    I have during the last couple of days read a lot about the opinion on whether Rafa should have been sacked or allowed one more season, if Roy was the right appointment or someone who is just out of the league of LFC.

    The current run of results in the league, the poor performances in EL (although better results) and not least the abysmal result against Northampton has sparked the above mentioned debate in several threads.

    Basically we are currently in a situation where our former boss had a very poor season last year leaving us in the worst league position since the early years of the premier league. He got sacked due to the result and on the expectations of a title challenge or at least CL placement considering the second place just one season earlier. This was coupled with some very poor displays on the pitch and early exits from cup competitions.

    Now Hodgson has taken over as manager for us with a lot of different opinions on him getting a chance at a tenure with us. The opinions ranging from the optimistic getting us back on track to the far from a step forward. So far he has managed to get us anything but a convincing performance, perhaps with the exception of the Arsenal game. Despite Hodgsons reputation for being a stable manager that gets teams organized and hard working, he has not managed to get this shown on the pitch.

    The debate rumbles on with a Rafa vs. Roy focus, if Rafa would have done better if still here? If Roy was the right appointment? or even if Mourinho, Hiddink or another manager would have done better?

    The question to me however is if we have to look better at the squad as a whole instead of blaming the manager, whom of course is always the one that gets the blame - fairly or not.

    In the wake of the result against Northampton where we had a good mix of squad players and youngsters playing, the question to me is not if Roy is the right manager for us, or if Rafa would have done any better - but rather: Is the current list of Liverpool players really any better than this?

    They have now underperformed for more than a year compared to expectations under two different mangers that both have their merits in the game of football. Perhaps our players are just not better than this, although it pains us to say?

    Reina is the only person that have performed throughout and Torres did well last season, but we have still a lot to see this season. Gerrard, our captain and third flagship, have not perfomed for a long time although trying a bit more this season.

    Just below them we have Agger, Carra, Johnson that are throwing in mixed performances during the time (perhaps N'gog as well this season). Capable players that in a good team would perform well.

    Then is the big mass of squad players that seems far from the standard needed to live up to the expectations we have for our beloved club: Lucas, Maxi, Babel, Skrtel, Kyriagos, Aurelio, Kuyt (dare I say it), all players that to me seems far from what we want and need.

    We have a few new players that I wont include in this, as they should still get time to adjust and find their way.

    I am really starting to think that this has very little to do with our managers but to do with our overall squad. We have 3 world class players, 3-4 good squad players and to me a lot of players that slows our play, that are not up to the standard and making it hard for the good players to produce. Perhaps it's a question of poor squad harmony and not enough players willing to fight for the team.

    In the current situation I am really starting to think that we need a bit overhaul of our squad rather than considering which manager we should have. The problem of this of course being the fact that we have no money to do a overhaul with and judging by the northampton game not enough youngsters that could take over. But right now with the current bunch of squad players I am starting to think that it couldn't hurt because the current bunch are showing nowhere near the ability needed to be around the top of the table.

    I hope I am mistaken and they start redeming themselves - but for now I honestly think we should look less at who our manager is and far more in the direction of a group of players that seem to neither have the will nor have the ability to play where LFC belongs in football - challenging for titles on a regular basis.

    #2
    ****ing hate all this Rafa v Roy bull**** we're seeing more and more often.

    Rafa's gone, Roy is here, lets get behind him for goodness sake!!

    Comment


      #3
      Rafa's GONE?!!!

      Comment


        #4
        Overhaul of our squad = no, as we don't have any money to invest in better players. Case in point, Konchesky and Poulsen. What's the point?
        Are we winning?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
          Overhaul of our squad = no, as we don't have any money to invest in better players. Case in point, Konchesky and Poulsen. What's the point?
          I pointed to the lack of money myself, and that is of course a major problem, but something to me is wrong within the squad and as such I'm starting to think it might be what is needed.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Darkon View Post
            I pointed to the lack of money myself, and that is of course a major problem, but something to me is wrong within the squad and as such I'm starting to think it might be what is needed.
            But the main aim, if I'm to believe in the board's good faith when the previous manager was sacked, was to get the better out of the current squad (which Benitez was alleged to have lost).

            If the main problem for them was that the previous manager was pressurising them too much in overhauling the squad, what's the point in applying the same principle with a different manager?

            Talk the talk and live by it. Let's see what he can do with 'better' players, he's done 'wonders' with Fulham.
            Are we winning?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Darkon View Post
              I pointed to the lack of money myself, and that is of course a major problem, but something to me is wrong within the squad and as such I'm starting to think it might be what is needed.
              I don't think it is. I'm of the belief that we have an unbalances squad and that only a couple of well chosen signings could make a lot of difference to many of the other players under the right circumstances. I think Roy has in general bought in players to ease the squad into playing the type of football he wants to play - which I guess is one way of approaching it.

              I don't think that Roy's signings have been bad as such just that I'm unconvinced that they solved the key problems that we had. We lacked width and we lacked forward looking tactical leadership on the pitch. The only player I feel who really looks to be an effort at addressing those issues was Meireles.

              With the departure of Yossi I think that the Cole signing was the right move to make. Completely unconvinced that he adds the balance we need but he is a high quality player.

              Poulsen seems very limited and to drag our team deeper which I think is unhelpful. He might however link well with Meireles.

              The players in the squad are certainly part of the problem but I don't think they are as irredeemably bad as some make out.
              "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
              -- William Blake

              Comment


                #8
                Our squad is still at least the 6th best in the league. Regardless of all the other ****e. A flexible manager would devise a system that best incorparates the squad. Time will tell if Roy is that man
                Forwards.......

                Comment


                  #9
                  The squad is very unbalanced and filled with a mish mash of (previously) overrated journeymen who wouldn't look out of place in far lesser teams than Liverpool.

                  However, despite all that, it's good enough to finish 6th/7th.

                  We won't though, because in addition to the faults in our team, we have an unambitious manager who seems to be happy to accept mid-table mediocrity judging by the way he organizes the team and chooses alehouse players over talented ones.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by dww View Post
                    I don't think it is. I'm of the belief that we have an unbalances squad and that only a couple of well chosen signings could make a lot of difference to many of the other players under the right circumstances. I think Roy has in general bought in players to ease the squad into playing the type of football he wants to play - which I guess is one way of approaching it.

                    I don't think that Roy's signings have been bad as such just that I'm unconvinced that they solved the key problems that we had. We lacked width and we lacked forward looking tactical leadership on the pitch. The only player I feel who really looks to be an effort at addressing those issues was Meireles.

                    With the departure of Yossi I think that the Cole signing was the right move to make. Completely unconvinced that he adds the balance we need but he is a high quality player.

                    Poulsen seems very limited and to drag our team deeper which I think is unhelpful. He might however link well with Meireles.

                    The players in the squad are certainly part of the problem but I don't think they are as irredeemably bad as some make out.


                    I agree with that it's also a case of needing a decent player to provide width rather than a good player who will stay narrow. I think Riera was a case in point. He was a good winger but not a world class one but he was a player who stayed out wide and gave us that extra dimension to our game. I don't think it's a coincidence that our best season was the one season where we regularly used the full width of the pitch to stretch teams.
                    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      im concerned about hodgson tactically than anything else.

                      i dont think he knows how to play without having abig one upfront and neither torres nor gerrard fit into his defined categories.

                      Rafa was always tactically on the ball (sometimes too much so) but at least he was always on his feet making constant adjustments.

                      All we ever see Roy do is hold up 5 fingers followed by the reverse wank. Not tactical genius that.

                      Not panicking still early days.
                      [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post


                        I agree with that it's also a case of needing a decent player to provide width rather than a good player who will stay narrow. I think Riera was a case in point. He was a good winger but not a world class one but he was a player who stayed out wide and gave us that extra dimension to our game. I don't think it's a coincidence that our best season was the one season where we regularly used the full width of the pitch to stretch teams.
                        Totally agree re: Riera.

                        On a related note - the use of Maxi this season baffles me. I know people have varied opinions of him but last season he seemed to be capable of offering width at least at times - this season he seems determined to become the appendix of the side: marginally off centre and completely useless.
                        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                        -- William Blake

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Rafa should never have been sacked, Hodgeson will take us to places we have never been to before.
                          It's a prediction thread on a wish list.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by malg View Post
                            Rafa should never have been sacked, Hodgeson will take us to places we have never been to before.
                            Such as?
                            Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by malg View Post
                              Rafa should never have been sacked, Hodgeson will take us to places we have never been to before.
                              You keep spelling his name with an "e" in it. There is no "e" in it. It's "Hodgson".

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X