Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pack your bags Roy

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Lecter View Post
    No Gray Areas - Liverpool should keep Roy

    In each Liverpool game there is a lot at stake at present. The fans will be up for their FA Cup tie with Manchester United but Premier League results are ultimately what will count for Roy Hodgson this season.

    Joe Cole's late winner against Bolton was important for the Reds and could have given them renewed confidence. Nevertheless, the manager is under immense pressure despite only being four months into the job.

    There's a lot more wrong with Liverpool than what is happening on the pitch. By the end of Rafael Benitez's reign they were practically a Spanish-speaking club with plenty of Spaniards in influential positions which made communication difficult.

    Roy Hodgson's main problem is that he was not appointed by the current owners of the club. It's the same problem that Mark Hughes faced at Manchester City and Sam Allardyce at Blackburn. As witnessed with those two, it can prove fatal.

    The American owners would probably prefer to install their own manager. They will want their man in charge and they won't care too much about the club's admirable tradition of not sacking managers too hastily.

    It's well documented that Premier League owners can be quick to pull the trigger on managers these days but clubs need continuity, especially one with such proud heritage as Liverpool.

    The owners should back the manager and let the team play their way out of trouble. Whichever way you look at it, Roy Hodgson needs his team to start winning soon.

    Andy Gray is now on Twitter so follow him for his exclusive tips and his take on the biggest stories in football each week.

    Published: 6 Jan 2011



    Roy Hodgson's main problem is that he was not appointed by the current owners of the club.
    Erm, no it isn't.
    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

    Comment


      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      Are you suggesting Hodgson has 127 hours before he's sacked?
      Absolutely no idea.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Lecter View Post
        No Gray Areas - Liverpool should keep Roy

        In each Liverpool game there is a lot at stake at present. The fans will be up for their FA Cup tie with Manchester United but Premier League results are ultimately what will count for Roy Hodgson this season.

        Joe Cole's late winner against Bolton was important for the Reds and could have given them renewed confidence. Nevertheless, the manager is under immense pressure despite only being four months into the job.

        There's a lot more wrong with Liverpool than what is happening on the pitch. By the end of Rafael Benitez's reign they were practically a Spanish-speaking club with plenty of Spaniards in influential positions which made communication difficult.

        Roy Hodgson's main problem is that he was not appointed by the current owners of the club. It's the same problem that Mark Hughes faced at Manchester City and Sam Allardyce at Blackburn. As witnessed with those two, it can prove fatal.

        The American owners would probably prefer to install their own manager. They will want their man in charge and they won't care too much about the club's admirable tradition of not sacking managers too hastily.

        It's well documented that Premier League owners can be quick to pull the trigger on managers these days but clubs need continuity, especially one with such proud heritage as Liverpool.

        The owners should back the manager and let the team play their way out of trouble. Whichever way you look at it, Roy Hodgson needs his team to start winning soon.

        Andy Gray is now on Twitter so follow him for his exclusive tips and his take on the biggest stories in football each week.

        Published: 6 Jan 2011
        Exactly for whom is this drivel written for, all they do is anger supporters of the game. Why? Surely there has to be a limit it how far they can go? They jsut can't all be that stupid, it's practically impossible!
        * The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

        Comment


          Wasn't it supposed to be on page 212?!?

          Those ****ing ITK's

          Comment


            Originally posted by Lecter View Post
            No Gray Areas - Liverpool should keep Roy

            In each Liverpool game there is a lot at stake at present. The fans will be up for their FA Cup tie with Manchester United but Premier League results are ultimately what will count for Roy Hodgson this season.

            Joe Cole's late winner against Bolton was important for the Reds and could have given them renewed confidence. Nevertheless, the manager is under immense pressure despite only being four months into the job.

            There's a lot more wrong with Liverpool than what is happening on the pitch. By the end of Rafael Benitez's reign they were practically a Spanish-speaking club with plenty of Spaniards in influential positions which made communication difficult.

            Roy Hodgson's main problem is that he was not appointed by the current owners of the club. It's the same problem that Mark Hughes faced at Manchester City and Sam Allardyce at Blackburn. As witnessed with those two, it can prove fatal.

            The American owners would probably prefer to install their own manager. They will want their man in charge and they won't care too much about the club's admirable tradition of not sacking managers too hastily.

            It's well documented that Premier League owners can be quick to pull the trigger on managers these days but clubs need continuity, especially one with such proud heritage as Liverpool.

            The owners should back the manager and let the team play their way out of trouble. Whichever way you look at it, Roy Hodgson needs his team to start winning soon.

            Andy Gray is now on Twitter so follow him for his exclusive tips and his take on the biggest stories in football each week.

            Published: 6 Jan 2011
            Eh No, Roy Hodgson's main problem is that is way way way out of his depth as LFC manager, and we have not progressed whatsoever since his time here. Pathetic statements from these guys, it makes no sense what they are saying. Jobs for the boys is all it is.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Shaggy View Post

              Erm, no it isn't.
              Exactly the owners are trying their hardest not to sack the ****er but he just keeps ****ing everything up. I kind of feel sorry for everyone involved but this has to stop.
              * The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Lecter View Post
                No Gray Areas - Liverpool should keep Roy

                In each Liverpool game there is a lot at stake at present. The fans will be up for their FA Cup tie with Manchester United but Premier League results are ultimately what will count for Roy Hodgson this season.

                Joe Cole's late winner against Bolton was important for the Reds and could have given them renewed confidence. Nevertheless, the manager is under immense pressure despite only being four months into the job.

                There's a lot more wrong with Liverpool than what is happening on the pitch. By the end of Rafael Benitez's reign they were practically a Spanish-speaking club with plenty of Spaniards in influential positions which made communication difficult.

                Roy Hodgson's main problem is that he was not appointed by the current owners of the club. It's the same problem that Mark Hughes faced at Manchester City and Sam Allardyce at Blackburn. As witnessed with those two, it can prove fatal.

                The American owners would probably prefer to install their own manager. They will want their man in charge and they won't care too much about the club's admirable tradition of not sacking managers too hastily.

                It's well documented that Premier League owners can be quick to pull the trigger on managers these days but clubs need continuity, especially one with such proud heritage as Liverpool.

                The owners should back the manager and let the team play their way out of trouble. Whichever way you look at it, Roy Hodgson needs his team to start winning soon.

                Andy Gray is now on Twitter so follow him for his exclusive tips and his take on the biggest stories in football each week.

                Published: 6 Jan 2011
                Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                Comment


                  Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

                  Comment


                    John Henry wanna get the **** up out of bed and sort some **** out!! Its chaos over this side of the water. If Roy isn't sacked by the end of the day i'll have serious doubts about NESV. There's biding your time and trying not to be rash, and there's just plain stupidity.

                    Comment


                      If Kenny is unavailable, surely Purslow could act as caretaker. He's already made his signings and knows his stuff.
                      Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Lecter View Post
                        The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
                          If Kenny is unavailable, surely Purslow could act as caretaker. He's already made his signings and knows his stuff.


                          I don't get, the sit back and relax approach NESV have been taking especailly recently. Do they not know that us losing and dropping down the league, is not a good thing productively or financially?

                          They seem to be prepared to wait to the detriment of the club, on the basis that they don't want to make a rash decision.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by danperkins View Post

                            I don't get the sit back and relax approach NESV have been taking. Do they not know that us losing and dropping down the league, is not a good thing productively or financially?

                            They seem to be prepared to wait to the detriment of the club.
                            They seem to be on course to fail their first big test tbh, if it's about the game on sunday, well screw that, sack Roy let Sammy manage the team past sunday and give it to someone else.
                            * The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              That passes for analysis.
                              i think you will find it doesnt

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by danperkins View Post


                                I don't get, the sit back and relax approach NESV have been taking.
                                They have clearly been learning tactics from Roy
                                Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X