18:00
-
-
Originally posted by ric.williams View Post
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 yearsComment
-
Thanks reece.
Heard on the wadio that roy is going to step down after the game.I hope so.Comment
-
Finally Jonjo gets a game.Comment
-
The Reds side in full is: Reina, Kelly, Carragher, Skrtel, Konchesky, Poulsen, Spearing, Jovanovic, Shelvey, Babel, Ngog. Subs: Jones, Kyrgiakos, Aurelio, Wilson, Maxi, Cole, Eccleston.Comment
-
Anyone have the Napoli team?Comment
-
Ignoring Reece's forward-thinking 7 2 1 formation, is that a 4 4 1 1 or a 4 2 3 1?
Or does it even matter?
Comment
-
Why the **** isn't Aurelio playing?Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Erm, because we have Konchesky available, does that need any further explanation?Originally posted by Shaggy View Post* The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.Comment
-
Because Konchesky is miles better, obviouslyOriginally posted by Shaggy View Post
BTW, I fully and wholeheartedly retract my previous train of thought which was along the lines of Konchesky not being as bad as people have made out
I'm a big man, I can admit my mistakesI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wetComment
-
wtf why not play aurelio!!
pleased for kelly and shelvey! shame they have to play alongside poulsen and the like!i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i doComment
-
Originally posted by The_weatherman View Post
Originally posted by Fierce View PostBecause Konchesky is miles better, obviously
BTW, I fully and wholeheartedly retract my previous train of thought which was along the lines of Konchesky not being as bad as people have made out
I'm a big man, I can admit my mistakes Fair play, I've seen a few people on here admitting they were wrong about one thing or another and they tend to get a load of stick for it, which I can't understand. Takes a bigger man to admit he was wrong about summat.
Konchesky's ****ing dog ****.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
As in radioactivity or wardrobe malfunction?Originally posted by elrichio86 View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
No Pacheco either.
Don't worry Dani, he'll be gone soon.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
Comment