Newcastle post match

[kris90210]

All that ranting and still a simple question is too difficult to answer.

One last time, cos i like you.

What do we do?
a) sack him
b) let him stay

Clock's ticking...

You obviously have a high opinion of yourself, Craig. I don't really know why. My point is not about Roy staying or going. It's about you attacking the owners.

But I would love to see the back of Roy.

[Craig_H]

Fair enough kris. Ignoring your views on me, if you would love to see the back of Roy, i dont know why you criticised me for saying they should sack him. That's all i dont get.

As for 'attacking' the owners - what can i say, our plight at the moment hurts and when something i care deeply about is going down the toilet, emotions can become quite powerful.

[DannyMan2006]

Fair enough kris. Ignoring your views on me, if you would love to see the back of Roy, i dont know why you criticised me for saying they should sack him. That's all i dont get.

As for 'attacking' the owners - what can i say, our plight at the moment hurts and when something i care deeply about is going down the toilet, emotions can become quite powerful.

I think Kris's main point is that yourself and others (including me) have failed to take on board that there may be reasons for them not sacking Roy, as opposed to them not being willing to let him go.

For instance, they may have a new man planned for the summer, the man they believe is the right man. I wouldn't want them to accept second choice just because that person may be available sooner.

So the next point is are there people who could do a short term job and is it worth it? Dalglish was mentioned, you yourself have suggested he may not be available. So who does that leave us with?

------

Personally I want Andres Villas Boas. If he had told me he would come in the summer and not before, I would wait.

--------

Of course, the horrible part is the not knowing. If we knew they were brining in a new man in the summer who we could all get along with I'm sure we'd all relax. But it would be wrong to release that information directly.

[Craig_H]

Even in that case, keeping Roy is doing serious (possibly terminal) damage.

As i said before, you have to stop the flow.

[red g]

Even in that case, keeping Roy is doing serious (possibly terminal) damage.

As i said before, you have to stop the flow.

So what is the answer?

lets say they have the top man lined up for the summer and Kenny doesn;t want it temp, what do we do?

personally I would ask THommo to take the reigns.....

[Craig_H]

So what is the answer?

lets say they have the top man lined up for the summer and Kenny doesn;t want it temp, what do we do?

personally I would ask THommo to take the reigns.....

There you go then.

[dom9]

I wouldn't.

There is no answer if they can't get the right man in yet.

[red g]

I wouldn't.

There is no answer if they can't get the right man in yet.

So you want to keep him till summer?

[dom9]

So you want to keep him till summer?

That's not what I said at all.

I'd like him gone yesterday. However, it is imperative that he is replaced properly. Someone that can stay for at least 5 years and build a new legacy. If there are no such candidates at this time, the options are limited.

[red g]

That's not what I said at all.

I'd like him gone yesterday. However, it is imperative that he is replaced properly. Someone that can stay for at least 5 years and build a new legacy. If there are no such candidates at this time, the options are limited.

U said no answer.....which means leave the same?

IF that candidate has been identified and is coming in the summer, what do we do?

[Fredo]

That's not what I said at all.

I'd like him gone yesterday. However, it is imperative that he is replaced properly. Someone that can stay for at least 5 years and build a new legacy. If there are no such candidates at this time, the options are limited.

Though Rafa might be available.

[kris90210]

I think Kris's main point is that yourself and others (including me) have failed to take on board that there may be reasons for them not sacking Roy, as opposed to them not being willing to let him go.

For instance, they may have a new man planned for the summer, the man they believe is the right man. I wouldn't want them to accept second choice just because that person may be available sooner.

So the next point is are there people who could do a short term job and is it worth it? Dalglish was mentioned, you yourself have suggested he may not be available. So who does that leave us with?

------

Personally I want Andres Villas Boas. If he had told me he would come in the summer and not before, I would wait.

--------

Of course, the horrible part is the not knowing. If we knew they were brining in a new man in the summer who we could all get along with I'm sure we'd all relax. But it would be wrong to release that information directly.

Exactly Danny. Thanks

And Craig, sorry man. I was getting personal there for no good reason. You know that I do respect you as a poster. I'm just as frustrated as you mate. We're all frustrated - I guess I'm clinging on to the hope that these new owners are genuine. If we get ****ed over again... well football already feels like a chore. It would be gutting to say the least.

[Craig_H]

That's not what I said at all.

I'd like him gone yesterday. However, it is imperative that he is replaced properly. Someone that can stay for at least 5 years and build a new legacy. If there are no such candidates at this time, the options are limited.

So what would you do then, if there are no such candidates at thiss time?

[wiw]

[RichC]

That's not what I said at all.

I'd like him gone yesterday. However, it is imperative that he is replaced properly. Someone that can stay for at least 5 years and build a new legacy. If there are no such candidates at this time, the options are limited.

It is about getting the right man who can build something over the longterm as you say

I still believe if LFC come knocking with clear backing from the owners then a lot of managers out there will still find it hard to say no to us.