Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pablo
    Anti-Antipodeanite
    • May 2007
    • 25808

    #17116
    His wife clearly is pregnant though, I think that much is obvious. But I agree it's completely irrelevant to the debate about whether he should stay or go

    Comment

    • MrMichael
      The Pun Police
      • Jul 2006
      • 33477

      #17117
      Originally posted by dom9
      The language used in that article is so inflammatory. It's practically tabloid. The only thing that might imply that it was written for a broadsheet is its length.
      Yup, it is pretty dreadful isn't it. Still, illustrates my point about them not easing up... and once again demonstrates that if Luis really was all that bothered about his treatment in the media the move he's trying to engineer really wouldn't be to another English club
      I could not dig, I dared not rob:
      Therefore I lied to please the mob.
      Now all my lies are proved untrue
      And I must face the men I slew.
      What tale shall serve me here among
      Mine angry and defrauded young?

      Comment

      • Bender
        Hodgsoned
        • Jul 2006
        • 37671

        #17118
        Suarez, Guardiola and his lawyer believe they have a legally binding clause. Liverpool do not and nor do the PFA or the Premier League. Essentially what it says is this: if Liverpool do not qualify for the Champions League or if Liverpool receive a bid of more than £40m, the club will sit down ‘in good faith’ and discuss it.
        It is not even remotely close to a trigger clause that would enable the Uruguayan to leave. As one insider said on Wednesday night, the Suarez camp ‘dropped the ball when it came to the phrasing of that sentence in the contract. It is so heavily caveated it amounts to nothing. Legally it is worthless.’

        The Suarez camp did not enjoy Monday’s meeting and responded by inviting two Spain-based journalists to interview the 26-year-old striker, with his inflammatory words appearing in Wednesday’s papers.


        Suarez on WEDNESDAY

        LINK

        Comment

        • Alex
          Administrator
          • Jul 2006
          • 37058

          #17119
          There must be something in the fact it was 2 spanish based journos. Done with an eye on Madrid or Athleti?
          *Except Michael, who died.

          Comment

          • Neil Young
            Prosecco Socialist
            • Aug 2006
            • 62564

            #17120
            What language was the interview conducted in?
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

            • Shaggy
              Unidentified Rascal
              • Jul 2006
              • 135533

              #17121
              Originally posted by Alex
              There must be something in the fact it was 2 spanish based journos. Done with an eye on Madrid or Athleti?
              Jenson and Lowe do all interviews with Spanish speakers for their papers where the interviews are conducted in Spanish. They're fluent and can translate. Nowt more than that I would've thought.
              Thanks very much for being

              Comment

              • Pablo
                Anti-Antipodeanite
                • May 2007
                • 25808

                #17122
                Originally posted by Alex
                There must be something in the fact it was 2 spanish based journos. Done with an eye on Madrid or Athleti?
                I think it's mainly that they both speak Spanish Alex :doh:

                Comment

                • Alex
                  Administrator
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 37058

                  #17123


                  Thought Uruguayans spoke Portuguese. Idiot.
                  *Except Michael, who died.

                  Comment

                  • Bender
                    Hodgsoned
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 37671

                    #17124
                    Some of Suarez's previous comments:
                    Suarez said: “Liverpool is a club with a reputation for doing things the right way, I just want them to abide by the promises made last season.”

                    Suarez should know all about broken promises. After all this is the same man who back in January said: “If you want to know what will happen to me if we don’t qualify for the Champions League, then I will say this: I have a contract with Liverpool and I am very happy here. I will stay.”
                    link

                    Comment

                    • Alex
                      Administrator
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 37058

                      #17125
                      Without wanting to defend him too much. But regarding his comments in January. Is he not allowed to change his mind? Things change all the time in peoples personal lives. He has a young family to think off too. Maybe its something we dont know about thats agitating this move.
                      *Except Michael, who died.

                      Comment

                      • Neil Young
                        Prosecco Socialist
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 62564

                        #17126
                        Originally posted by Shaggy
                        Jenson and Lowe do all interviews with Spanish speakers for their papers where the interviews are conducted in Spanish. They're fluent and can translate. Nowt more than that I would've thought.
                        Eso es lo que estaba pensando.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                        • PTP
                          Passion for fire alarms or extinguishers?
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 34987

                          #17127
                          Originally posted by Alex
                          Without wanting to defend him too much. But regarding his comments in January. Is he not allowed to change his mind? Things change all the time in peoples personal lives. He has a young family to think off too. Maybe its something we dont know about thats agitating this move.
                          nope - he's a cunt
                          i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do

                          Comment

                          • Pedenj
                            Benitez
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 974

                            #17128
                            Originally posted by PTP
                            nope - he's a cunt

                            Comment

                            • Neil Young
                              Prosecco Socialist
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 62564

                              #17129
                              Originally posted by Alex
                              Without wanting to defend him too much. But regarding his comments in January. Is he not allowed to change his mind? Things change all the time in peoples personal lives. He has a young family to think off too. Maybe its something we dont know about thats agitating this move.
                              I was going to agree but then deleted my comment.

                              Having read the replies though, yeah, you make a fair point.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                              • Pablo
                                Anti-Antipodeanite
                                • May 2007
                                • 25808

                                #17130
                                Yes he's allowed to change his mind, but I think it's the underhand way he's gone about the whole thing that's so galling and is most upsetting for fans.

                                Comment

                                Working...