Luis Suárez

[kev776]

Good news if he can get some game time before the end of the season.

I think we're going to see a 12 game ban for Luis, rest of this season and then the first 8 of next .

This.

[Tee]

I think Ashley Williams set the precedent here, he nearly killed RVO and got nothing. Ivanovic's life was never in danger.

[BobTheCharmer]

Whatever ban they give him will be deemed not enough - they've already ruled out a standard 3 match ban but if they give 5 - people will want 7. If they give 7 - people will want 10. If they give 10 - people will want 15.

Pleased to see a few journalists realising how up in arms everyone is about this and seemingly ignore, for example, McManamanananananan's tackle on Heidara.

The tackle is irrelevant. It was part of the game, he went and got the ball and followed through and got the player. Mistimed yes. Biting someone unless female and on the arse is a cunts trick.

[Sarb]

Echo are saying 6-8 games. David Cameron wants FA to throw the book at Suarez. He never misses an opportunity does he. What an odious piece of ****e. Never known two guys more opportunistic than him and Osborne

Why doesn't he pass an emergency law so that Suarez can go to jail, much like he did with the rioters. Turd

[Norbs]

Yes I didn't realise I have to show a link to everything I post quite tiresome this place

Shut the door on your way out then love

[Chazza]

Good news if he can get some game time before the end of the season.

I think we're going to see a 12 game ban for Luis, rest of this season and then the first 8 of next .

12 games would show that the FA deem biting an opponent to be worse than racially abusing Evra.

[Captain Stu]

The tackle is irrelevant. It was part of the game, he went and got the ball and followed through and got the player. Mistimed yes. Biting someone unless female and on the arse is a cunts trick.

The point is that biting someone is seen as being MORE dangerous than a full-blooded, high foot studs showing tackle right on the kneecap.

Yes it's a disgusting move and should absolutely be punished but, yet again, the FA show themselves up when they practically call in a lynch mob and a hangman for this yet let persistent dirty *******s off.

12 games would show that the FA deem biting an opponent to be worse than racially abusing Evra.

And ending someone's career with a knee-high tackle.
And elbowing someone right in the face.

[Norbs]

I think Ashley Williams set the precedent here, he nearly killed RVO and got nothing. Ivanovic's life was never in danger.

Should've put that in spoilers Tee, I wont sleep for weeks again now. Poor RVP, I just don't know how he copes

[Sarb]

12 games would show that the FA deem biting an opponent to be worse than racially abusing Evra.

The issue isn't with the ban. Suarez should be banned. But the FA are totally incompetent and hypocritical with the bans they dish out. They deemed Terry's racist incident no worse than violent conduct. If they give Suarez more than 8 games then they deem a bite worse than racism.

They are fools. Not really got any faith that he won't get more than 8 games. They're a joke

[Norbs]

12 games would show that the FA deem biting an opponent to be worse than racially abusing Evra.

To be fair, he did ACTUALLY bite Ivanovic, whereas...

[Sarb]

The point is that biting someone is seen as being MORE dangerous than a full-blooded, high foot studs showing tackle right on the kneecap.

Yes it's a disgusting move and should absolutely be punished but, yet again, the FA show themselves up when they practically call in a lynch mob and a hangman for this yet let persistent dirty *******s off.



And ending someone's career with a knee-high tackle.
And elbowing someone right in the face.

Rio elbowing Torres in the back of the head. The ref didn't see that. FA didn't deem it violent conduct. But a bite is worse than violent conduct? Really, how does that work?

No LFC fan has an issue with the ban. But the FA are totally clueless

[RichC]

12 games would show that the FA deem biting an opponent to be worse than racially abusing Evra.

I'm not sure they'll link the two, I think they'll use the fact he's got a history of this and use it as an opportunity to throw the book at him.

Pressure from externals I.e. press & the Manc influence will see a long ban IMO.

[BobTheCharmer]

The point is that biting someone is seen as being MORE dangerous than a full-blooded, high foot studs showing tackle right on the kneecap.

Yes it's a disgusting move and should absolutely be punished but, yet again, the FA show themselves up when tI like tey practically call in a lynch mob and a hangman for this yet let persistent dirty *******s off.



And ending someone's career with a knee-high tackle.
And elbowing someone right in the face.

Nothing to do with more dangerous in my mind, it has no place in sport or life. Tackles are great and whether over the top or not they are very much part of football. Why are you trying to defend him? He is guilty of being a cunt. Accept the punishment and move on. Just like i admire the fact our players don't surround the ref like utd do, I want our players to have a certain standard. Old fashioned view obviously.

[Sarb]

I'm not sure they'll link the two, I think they'll use the fact he's got a history of this and use it as an opportunity to throw the book at him.

Pressure from externals I.e. press & the Manc influence will see a long ban IMO.

But that isn't right though is it. There was media pressure re. Terry but they totally balls'd that up and many said they would. It's borderline xenophobia. They treat foreign players totally different to their English darlings.

They had no issue going to defend Rooney over in Switzerland for violent conduct and campaigning to get his ban reduced

[Captain Stu]

No LFC fan has an issue with the ban. But the FA are totally clueless

Absolutely.

I haven't seen one single fan ANYWHERE taking issue with him being banned - the collective problem, as you say, is that he'll be made an example of while others committing far deeds go relatively unpunished.

The Daily Fail has a ridiculous backpage, calling us spineless for not banning him while practically everyone else has "praised" our response. We've done everything we could realistically do.

Nothing to do with more dangerous in my mind, it has no place in sport or life. Tackles are great and whether over the top or not they are very much part of football. Why are you trying to defend him? He is guilty of being a cunt. Accept the punishment and move on. Just like i admire the fact our players don't surround the ref like utd do, I want our players to have a certain standard. Old fashioned view obviously.

Hmmm, I must have missed the part where I was defending Suarez. Could you kindly point it out for me?