Luis Suárez

[Kenneth]

No. Past record in England can be considered.

[Philgas]

I thought it was interesting why can't I find it interesting ??? I have no link but I heard it on the radio

[RedReet]

Assuming the ban will extend to next season we should send Suarez on loan to a lower league team to play some cup qualifiers before our season starts, like Barton nearly did for Fleetwood.

[Philgas]

No. Past record in England can be considered.

Cheers ken for not picking the bones out of the post ynwa

[Kenneth]

We won't appeal any ban though.
5-8 games I reckon...........we appeal, they add on another couple.

Depends on the size of the ban obviously. 5-8 then I agree that we definitely won't. 10 maybe not either. 12+ then maybe we would/should.

[McDermotX]

Surely they have to take this as a single incident

Of course they should,
but without dragging up the Evra report and punishment, I suspect there may have been something about 'warned as to future behaviour'.
But overall, certain players have always being 'treated' differently, for a variety of reasons.......bias, media influence, country of representation etc

I thought it was interesting why can't I find it interesting ??? I have no link but I heard it on the radio

Me hole !

[Kenneth]

Assuming the ban will extend to next season we should send Suarez on loan to a lower league team to play some cup qualifiers before our season starts, like Barton nearly did for Fleetwood.

That would be incendiary, Suarez dancing past a bunch of kickers in the lower leagues.

[McDermotX]

Depends on the size of the ban obviously. 5-8 then I agree that we definitely won't. 10 maybe not either. 12+ then maybe we would/should.

Agreed on 12.........that would be ****ing ridiculous, You would hope the FA would at least be somewhat realistic and try to appear fair.........them and their 'independent panel'.

[Philgas]

Of course they should,
but without dragging up the Evra report and punishment, I suspect there may have been something about 'warned as to future behaviour'.
But overall, certain players have always being 'treated' differently, for a variety of reasons.......bias, media influence, country of representation etc



Me hole !

Me hole ??? Explain please

[PTP]

i'd usually expect a four game ban

3 game ban for violent conduct is about right, and the FA throw another game on because it's Suarez.

I'd say that was fair - he's 'out' till next season

However with the FA and the way the media go mental about Suarez, i fully expecting something ridiculous - really wouldn't be shocked if it was 12 games

in fact, i'd say it's more likely to be 12 games (extremely harsh) than 3 games (fair)

Any other player in the league would escape with nothing worse than 3 games.

[cream]

It would be even more stupid to back him over this and say he won't be sold then go and sell him a few months later

He's our biggest asset and FSG are just protecting their investment. It would be silly give any indication that we may be willing sellers, we'd be lucky to fetch £25m.

[Mattshark]

i'd usually expect a four game ban

3 game ban for violent conduct is about right, and the FA throw another game on because it's Suarez.

I'd say that was fair - he's 'out' till next season

However with the FA and the way the media go mental about Suarez, i fully expecting something ridiculous - really wouldn't be shocked if it was 12 games

in fact, i'd say it's more likely to be 12 games (extremely harsh) than 3 games (fair)

Any other player in the league would escape with nothing worse than 3 games.

[Aj34]

One thing in our favour is fergie is probably in a good mood and will only go for a medium length ban

[Captain Stu]

Depends on the size of the ban obviously. 5-8 then I agree that we definitely won't. 10 maybe not either. 12+ then maybe we would/should.

We won't appeal, we just can't.

[fah-q]

If it is longer than 10 games, we should loan him back to Ajax for a bit as part of the Erikssen deal