Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chazza
    Des Lynam
    • Jan 2007
    • 31141

    #7051
    I hope we know what we are doing here because if this backfires then it will big time with a hefty ban.

    Comment

    • kop-al-74
      Dalglish
      • Jul 2006
      • 3941

      #7052
      Originally posted by shanks69
      inform the fa it might work in suarez's favour
      Might be worth a shot!

      Why the rolleyes?
      -----------------------------------------------

      'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'

      Bill Shankly.

      Comment

      • Assassin
        Kloppite
        • Sep 2006
        • 25908

        #7053
        Originally posted by Chazza
        I hope we know what we are doing here because if this backfires then it will big time with a hefty ban.
        I believe the club has done this to be able to challenge any ban given longer than 3 games

        Comment

        • shanks69
          Shankly
          • Dec 2007
          • 5089

          #7054
          Originally posted by kop-al-74
          Might be worth a shot!

          Why the rolleyes?
          because we know the fa wont listen to us.
          who's arsed?

          Comment

          • Neil Young
            Prosecco Socialist
            • Aug 2006
            • 62564

            #7055
            Originally posted by Assassin
            I believe the club has done this to be able to challenge any ban given longer than 3 games
            Why? I can't think of anything to suggest that.

            I think it's fine to argue about the length of the ban before any has been imposed. But I can't see any reason why the club would appeal against the sentence of the tribunal, unless it's totally outlandish, like months or a dozen or more games. Challenging a ban of, say, seven games, I just can't see any benefit.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

            • kop-al-74
              Dalglish
              • Jul 2006
              • 3941

              #7056
              Originally posted by shanks69
              because we know the fa wont listen to us.
              Lol...I have sent the FA an email....Let's see if I get a response
              -----------------------------------------------

              'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'

              Bill Shankly.

              Comment

              • Neil Young
                Prosecco Socialist
                • Aug 2006
                • 62564

                #7057
                Why? If they don't reply it's not like we can read anything into it.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment

                • Assassin
                  Kloppite
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 25908

                  #7058
                  Originally posted by Neil Young
                  Why? I can't think of anything to suggest that.

                  I think it's fine to argue about the length of the ban before any has been imposed. But I can't see any reason why the club would appeal against the sentence of the tribunal, unless it's totally outlandish, like months or a dozen or more games. Challenging a ban of, say, seven games, I just can't see any benefit.
                  IMO the club and Suarez would have a good case. For instance the Defoe case. As stated On here Fellaini headbutting Shawcross on more than one occasion. There are countless other cases they can refer too

                  Comment

                  • kop-al-74
                    Dalglish
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 3941

                    #7059
                    Originally posted by Neil Young
                    Why? If they don't reply it's not like we can read anything into it.
                    -----------------------------------------------

                    'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'

                    Bill Shankly.

                    Comment

                    • Neil Young
                      Prosecco Socialist
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 62564

                      #7060
                      Originally posted by Assassin
                      IMO the club and Suarez would have a good case. For instance the Defoe case. As stated On here Fellaini headbutting Shawcross on more than one occasion. There are countless other cases they can refer too
                      Sure, they've got a case, there are precedents, but I can't imagine the club would want to do it.

                      But I'm in danger of repeating myself from yesterday. When he gets a few games more than the minimum then we'll see what happens I suppose.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment

                      • Arn
                        Alway confused
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 7129

                        #7061
                        There is really no point to appeal against a decision by the FA.

                        Only one won and over five hundred lost appeals IIRC.

                        If we appeal then he will almost guaranteed get an even longer ban.
                        Stop the cyberhate


                        from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a

                        Susan Black

                        Comment

                        • ChesterDave
                          Paisley
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 32224

                          #7062
                          The club should shut up and take 8. Mull over and probably reluctantly accept 10. Appeal 12+

                          I think 12 is likely but can see 4-6 being suspended.
                          Football without Origi is nothing

                          Comment

                          • Aj34
                            Benitez
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 933

                            #7063
                            Well one thing we have in common with barca they can't defend either

                            Comment

                            • fah-q
                              Touching cloth
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 16727

                              #7064
                              Crispin Glover scores, he might be surplus next season.
                              Last edited by fah-q; 23-04-13, 07:55 PM. Reason: Balls, wrong thread.

                              Comment

                              • shanks69
                                Shankly
                                • Dec 2007
                                • 5089

                                #7065
                                Originally posted by kop-al-74
                                Lol...I have sent the FA an email....Let's see if I get a response
                                who's arsed?

                                Comment

                                Working...