Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pedenj
    Benitez
    • Jul 2006
    • 974

    #7186
    Any time this afternoon - no definite time set as far I know.

    Comment

    • Vermilion
      Shooterista
      • Dec 2007
      • 32026

      #7187
      Originally posted by G
      When fergie tells us
      of course!

      Comment

      • Le Chef
        Paisley
        • Jul 2006
        • 10745

        #7188
        Originally posted by Arn
        We didn't pay him. We probably paid a PR company and they used their connections.

        The paper then told Holt to write the article.

        Don't you find it very strange that almost nothing positive about it was said yesterday in the papers and today suddenly almost all of them say the same positive thing.

        All of them about the same things. The lenght of the ban. How the FA handles it, that dangerous tackles is more dangerous than a bite.
        Arn, having worked in newspapers and including the mirror, it doesn't work like that. No way one this earth would Ollie Holt put his name to a story he didn't write or was told to write. they'd have the union demanding strike action for such a request.

        PR agencies work by submitting press releases, they also get to know journo's and feed them information,.they don't write copy and get it printed under a journo's name.
        I make no apologies, this is me

        Comment

        • Assassin
          Kloppite
          • Sep 2006
          • 25908

          #7189
          Originally posted by Deano
          Arn, having worked in newspapers and including the mirror, it doesn't work like that. No way one this earth would Ollie Holt put his name to a story he didn't write or was told to write. they'd have the union demanding strike action for such a request.

          PR agencies work by submitting press releases, they also get to know journo's and feed them information,.they don't write copy and get it printed under a journo's name.
          So what is your slant on the "climbdown" by many journos?

          Comment

          • fah-q
            Touching cloth
            • Jul 2006
            • 16727

            #7190
            Originally posted by Deano
            Arn, having worked in newspapers and including the mirror, it doesn't work like that. No way one this earth would Ollie Holt put his name to a story he didn't write or was told to write. they'd have the union demanding strike action for such a request.

            PR agencies work by submitting press releases, they also get to know journo's and feed them information,.they don't write copy and get it printed under a journo's name.
            Absolutely, they're too busy hacking people's phones and stuff.

            Comment

            • gentingfrmhell
              Benitez
              • Jul 2008
              • 643

              #7191
              suarez's got the overwhelming will to win

              Comment

              • Le Chef
                Paisley
                • Jul 2006
                • 10745

                #7192
                Common sense to be honest - they've taken the Terry ban and used it as a yardstick to the punishment to be dished out. Quite rightly they've said how can you ban a player for more than 4 games for a non career threatening injury albeit it a serious offence and then only give a player they've found guilty of racism 4 games. Add in Liverpool's charm offensive and they've softened (apart from a few)
                I make no apologies, this is me

                Comment

                • Le Chef
                  Paisley
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 10745

                  #7193
                  Originally posted by fah-q
                  Absolutely, they're too busy hacking people's phones and stuff.
                  Probably
                  I make no apologies, this is me

                  Comment

                  • kev776
                    Paisley
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 12035

                    #7194
                    Originally posted by Deano
                    Common sense to be honest - they've taken the Terry ban and used it as a yardstick to the punishment to be dished out. Quite rightly they've said how can you ban a player for more than 4 games for a non career threatening injury albeit it a serious offence and then only give a player they've found guilty of racism 4 games. Add in Liverpool's charm offensive and they've softened (apart from a few)
                    So 9 it will be then.
                    Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
                    Those that killed her, were following the law.

                    Comment

                    • kev776
                      Paisley
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 12035

                      #7195
                      Does Suarez have a Santa in his contract?
                      Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
                      Those that killed her, were following the law.

                      Comment

                      • tsb
                        Dalglish
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 4808

                        #7196
                        I hope he refuses this anger management crap.

                        It will be the equivalent of taking your dog to vet to get fixed.

                        Comment

                        • Neil Young
                          Prosecco Socialist
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 62564

                          #7197
                          Originally posted by tsb
                          I hope he refuses this anger management crap.
                          I don't think it's anything to worry about. It strikes me as a bureaucratic response and will change nothing except to give the appearance that steps are to be taken to address "the issue".
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment

                          • Le Chef
                            Paisley
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 10745

                            #7198
                            Originally posted by kev776
                            So 9 it will be then.
                            Well the FA are a bunch of morons who live in their own bubble. They are so disconnected from their own game and fans they actually don't give a flying **** about the fans or being seen as hypocrites as long as the sponsors are being taken care of.

                            Point in kind when defending the time to kick off for the FA Cup final, tehy responded that fans should use their partner Natiional Express only to be told they aren't putting on extra buses and the last one leaves London that day at around 8pm.
                            I make no apologies, this is me

                            Comment

                            • tsb
                              Dalglish
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 4808

                              #7199
                              Originally posted by Neil Young
                              I don't think it's anything to worry about. It strikes me as a bureaucratic response and will change nothing except to give the appearance that steps are to be taken to address "the issue".
                              I thought you of all people would sympathise with the vet analogy

                              Comment

                              • Neil Young
                                Prosecco Socialist
                                • Aug 2006
                                • 62564

                                #7200
                                I did. I just didn't want it to get in the way of the serious bit.

                                As I just read your post I realised I was crossing my legs without thinking.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...