Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G
    Paisley
    • Aug 2006
    • 16686

    #4111
    Dan Kennett ‏@DanKennett
    Just finished latest fan session with BR on behalf of @paul_tomkins. Some fascinating insight and will aim to get TTT post online tonight
    Dan Kennett ‏@DanKennett
    The most interesting nugget was that Suarez future most likely to be as a creative wide forward playing close to a mobile & clinical 9 #lfc

    Comment

    • el matador
      Facing the firing squad for suggesting Brian McBride as a transfer target!
      • Dec 2006
      • 6957

      #4112
      completely agree about suarez playing out wide.

      suits him better and paves the way for a more clinical no.9
      [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

      Comment

      • yamiedo
        Dalglish
        • Jan 2011
        • 3155

        #4113
        Wow. Finally! I really hope that's true because I always felt it is better for the team as a whole if Suarez plays wide. Our problem area is out wide. Our final ball and decisiveness in the area will be greatly enhanced if we sign a goalscoring striker and have a genius like Suarez playing wide.

        Comment

        • Daniel 7
          Heretic
          • Mar 2008
          • 24088

          #4114
          Suarez is great

          Shame FSG are letting him down with poor investment in the squad. He's going to be 30 by the time we're competitive.

          Comment

          • Mattshark
            Still Blames Thatcher
            • Aug 2006
            • 24691

            #4115
            Originally posted by Daniel 7
            Suarez is great

            Shame FSG are letting him down with poor investment in the squad. He's going to be 30 by the time we're competitive.
            Well that is demonstrably false.
            www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

            www.twitter.com/lbmlt

            www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

            Comment

            • Kenneth
              Pond Scum
              • May 2007
              • 65633

              #4116
              No it's not. Spending 70 million on Carroll, Henderson and Downing is pretty much the epitome of poor investment.
              Last edited by Kenneth; 21-12-12, 09:36 PM.
              Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

              Comment

              • Daniel 7
                Heretic
                • Mar 2008
                • 24088

                #4117
                Ok, so maybe poor investment is poor terminology

                Ill advised investment is closer to the mark.

                Comment

                • Alex
                  Administrator
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 37058

                  #4118
                  It's great investment. We have just invested in something terrible.
                  *Except Michael, who died.

                  Comment

                  • Daniel 7
                    Heretic
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 24088

                    #4119
                    Yes, hence ill advised

                    Comment

                    • Alex
                      Administrator
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 37058

                      #4120
                      Spent ages writing an analogy, but it was awful and I didn't see your post
                      *Except Michael, who died.

                      Comment

                      • Mattshark
                        Still Blames Thatcher
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 24691

                        #4121
                        Originally posted by Alex
                        It's great investment. We have just invested in something terrible.
                        And that is down to the management, not FSG. We'd be pissed if we had interfering owners in that regard.
                        www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                        www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                        www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                        Comment

                        • ~LFCHistory~
                          Dalglish
                          • Oct 2011
                          • 2166

                          #4122
                          Originally posted by Mattshark
                          And that is down to the management, not FSG. We'd be pissed if we had interfering owners in that regard.
                          Exactly. The problem last year was not FSG or a lack of money for transfers. The problem was that Dalglish and Comolli were utterly ****ing clueless.
                          http://www.youtube.com/user/LFCHistory?feature=mhee

                          Comment

                          • Mostar
                            Chief Scout
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 23194

                            #4123
                            Originally posted by Mattshark
                            And that is down to the management, not FSG. We'd be pissed if we had interfering owners in that regard.
                            I don't think it is clear cut as that.

                            Imo they are both responsible.

                            It's true that they have given Kenny certain amount of funds that wasn't invested properly but they haven't provided the similar level of support to BR and we are paying the price as result.

                            Cutting down on wages and getting rid off deadweight is/was necessary but in the process we let go some of the players that we could have used this year and we failed to replace them.

                            24m (give or take) summer spending was not going to be enough to fill all the gaps in our paper-thin squad and even though they said this would be long term project, for me this season has been as disappointing and as discouraging as the season before if not even worse.

                            Time will tell but if they really want to turn this club into a powerhouse once was and allow us to compete with other big clubs, which is what they said on more than one ocassion, they will have to do more and be more directly involved.

                            Otherwise, this vicious cycle of regularly missing on CL and our inability to attract top talent will sadly continue.
                            Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan club

                            Comment

                            • Leyton388
                              aka liverpooltj
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 26044

                              #4124
                              Originally posted by Mostar
                              I don't think it is clear cut as that.

                              Imo they are both responsible.

                              It's true that they have given Kenny certain amount of funds that wasn't invested properly but they haven't provided the similar level of support to BR and we are paying the price as result.

                              Cutting down on wages and getting rid off deadweight is/was necessary but in the process we let go some of the players that we could have used this year and we failed to replace them.

                              24m (give or take) summer spending was not going to be enough to fill all the gaps in our paper-thin squad and even though they said this would be long term project, for me this season has been as disappointing and as discouraging as the season before if not even worse.

                              Time will tell but if they really want to turn this club into a powerhouse once was and allow us to compete with other big clubs, which is what they said on more than one ocassion, they will have to do more and be more directly involved.

                              Otherwise, this vicious cycle of regularly missing on CL and our inability to attract top talent will sadly continue.


                              They all played their part and after getting "their man" They did not back him as much as they did with Kenny. As a result of that we are where we are at the moment.

                              Comment

                              • RichC
                                Meh
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 37415

                                #4125
                                But that's why it was always going to take longer than last Summers transfer window, we spent a lot in the summer but there is still work to be done on the squad and without a Russian mafia billionaire or a sheik backing the club it just wouldn't have been possible to fill all the gaps we have.

                                Comment

                                Working...