Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fah-q
    Touching cloth
    • Jul 2006
    • 16727

    #7876
    Originally posted by Lecter
    I hate Ferguson, the Premier League and the FA will be a much better place without his sphere of influence but there is just no comparison between absuing an official post match and getting fined a book token and what Suarez has done

    Suarez was warned for the first offence, his card has been marked and they've hammered him this time

    Barton got off lightly imo but again this only goes to highlight how arbitrary the punishments are. Without clear guidelines you will have hugely inconsistent punishments
    It's not the same offence no, but repeated breaking of their rules should mean that they apply the same principles of "totting up" regardless of the offence.

    Comment

    • Lecter
      Nicked from elsewhere
      • Jul 2006
      • 18261

      #7877
      Originally posted by Shaggy
      I didn't say there was but you can't arbitrarily decide to start increasing bans for repeat offences just because an offence is deemed by someone as more severe than others. The principle has to remain the same, surely, regardless of the offence. You either increase punishments exponentially for repeat offences or you don't - and this FA appear to have never done so in the past.
      You can if you are the FA and you dont have any guidelines laid down in the first place
      Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

      Comment

      • Shaggy
        Unidentified Rascal
        • Jul 2006
        • 135533

        #7878
        Originally posted by fah-q
        It's not the same offence no, but repeated breaking of their rules should mean that they apply the same principles of "totting up" regardless of the offence.


        They're clearly just making it up as they go along, despite no precedents.
        Thanks very much for being

        Comment

        • Lecter
          Nicked from elsewhere
          • Jul 2006
          • 18261

          #7879
          Originally posted by fah-q
          It's not the same offence no, but repeated breaking of their rules should mean that they apply the same principles of "totting up" regardless of the offence.
          They should but Fergie is untouchable and really because of that I'm not sure what real relevance you can give towards the Suarez case
          Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

          Comment

          • Lecter
            Nicked from elsewhere
            • Jul 2006
            • 18261

            #7880
            Originally posted by Shaggy


            They're clearly just making it up as they go along, despite no precedents.
            Making it up is a bit far

            Decisions are clearly too arbitrary, probably because the review panels are all different and they have no real rules or guidelines to follow
            Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

            Comment

            • Shaggy
              Unidentified Rascal
              • Jul 2006
              • 135533

              #7881
              Originally posted by Lecter
              They should but Fergie is untouchable and really because of that I'm not sure what real relevance you can give towards the Suarez case
              It's not just Ferguson - countless have been "warned about their future conduct", offended again and not been subject to "totting up". Pulis, Allardyce, Brown, Benitez, Rooney, Cattermole, Ferdinand etc. It just never applies. Except we're told it does now
              Thanks very much for being

              Comment

              • Shaggy
                Unidentified Rascal
                • Jul 2006
                • 135533

                #7882
                Originally posted by Lecter
                Making it up is a bit far

                Decisions are clearly too arbitrary, probably because the review panels are all different and they have no real rules or guidelines to follow
                What do you think they're doing then? They seem to be plucking figures from thin air - completely arbitrarily. That's making it up. As you say there are no guidelines, no precedents, no consistency, no **** all - so they make it up.
                Thanks very much for being

                Comment

                • fah-q
                  Touching cloth
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 16727

                  #7883
                  If they wanted to be seen as impartial they should have a regular panel made up of non football people with legal experience with no club affiliations of any kind.

                  Let's face it, football people tend to be a bit dim.

                  Comment

                  • Fan65
                    Fagan
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 1440

                    #7884
                    I still can't believe he did it, WHY ??? just plain crazy, it was always going to be public hanging, even when his name was bandied about for the player of the year I heard journo's saying they doubt he'd win it because of the Evra incident and what has that got to do with it but I think they're right..

                    Get Big Andy back for the six games and let him throw his weight about the penalty area and knock a few teeth out, wont be great but at least it'll cheer me up a bit.

                    You never know he might do well alongside Sturridge and his market value could rocket up to around £10 million

                    Comment

                    • Shaggy
                      Unidentified Rascal
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 135533

                      #7885
                      Some Scotch journo (Graham Ruthven?) thinks Suarez should have been given community service! LMAO!

                      I won't link to his drivel. What a tool.
                      Thanks very much for being

                      Comment

                      • fah-q
                        Touching cloth
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 16727

                        #7886
                        He could always send his "double" along to do it, like Mark Morrison did.

                        Comment

                        • fah-q
                          Touching cloth
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 16727

                          #7887
                          ****, I've just realised. I may have just invoked Clint Doggy Dogg.

                          Comment

                          • Fivex
                            The Wisp
                            • Nov 2006
                            • 23867

                            #7888
                            Diggity
                            Hello mert.

                            Comment

                            • Sarb
                              Doomed, we're all doomed!
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 11302

                              #7889
                              Originally posted by Shaggy
                              Some Scotch journo (Graham Ruthven?) thinks Suarez should have been given community service! LMAO!

                              I won't link to his drivel. What a tool.
                              Not sure why he moans about getting absuse off LFC fans when he comes out with drivel like that. Isn't the first time

                              Comment

                              • Shaggy
                                Unidentified Rascal
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 135533

                                #7890
                                Training this morning

                                Thanks very much for being

                                Comment

                                Working...