Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ronanm
    Shankly
    • Aug 2006
    • 5652

    #10711
    Yes, he's a great player. But at what stage do we say "Fine then, if you don't want to be here then we'll put you up for sale"? He's had a few interviews now where the theme has been the same so there doesn't seem to be much ambiguity. Not sure I want him here next season with his antics in the past week.
    Substance > Style

    Comment

    • Sarb
      Doomed, we're all doomed!
      • Jun 2007
      • 11302

      #10712
      Souness is strange. After the Chelsea game he was saying that Suarez had disgraced LFC and should pretty much be sold. Now he's all for keeping him against his wishes. Really needs to make his mind up.

      Been listening to a few journos. Graham Hunter who is pretty clued up on the Spanish game has said the quotes/interviews are pre-planned by Suarez and his agent. Apparently,Real wanted Cavani but were priced out. So then turned to Suarez but have told Suarez to force the move as they won't pay top price for him. Hence his interviews.

      Suarez has been pretty badly advised and has acted a tool to be honest. Sometimes I even wonder if the bite was a deliberate part of the plan. Was just totally unprovoked and out of the blue when you think about it. To do it twice is very odd

      Comment

      • Fredo
        Not to be taken seriously
        • Aug 2010
        • 35173

        #10713
        Originally posted by Tee
        Its all gone a bit quiet on the Suarez transfer front, and with SSN having a Mourinho wankfest this week I hope the club and player can sort something out that sees him stay for at least next season.
        Don't harbour any hopes. If he doesn't want to go, the press will harass him until he submits to their wish.
        Are we winning?

        Comment

        • Neil Young
          Prosecco Socialist
          • Aug 2006
          • 62564

          #10714
          It wasn't totally unprovoked, Ivanovic stood on his foot, probably accidentally but Suárez may not have realised that, heat of the moment etc.

          But yes, I don't think we can rule out the idea that the bite was preconceived.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment

          • Fredo
            Not to be taken seriously
            • Aug 2010
            • 35173

            #10715
            Originally posted by Neil Young
            It wasn't totally unprovoked, Ivanovic stood on his foot, probably accidentally but Suárez may not have realised that, heat of the moment etc.

            But yes, I don't think we can rule out the idea that the bite was preconceived.
            Arn had the foresight to see that, was laughed at, and now it's completely feasible.

            Arnish
            Are we winning?

            Comment

            • Sarb
              Doomed, we're all doomed!
              • Jun 2007
              • 11302

              #10716
              Originally posted by Nigey
              Don't harbour any hopes. If he doesn't want to go, the press will harass him until he submits to their wish.
              Nigey, do you really think it's all down to the press forcing him out? It really isn't. He's used it as an excuse.

              Comment

              • Sarb
                Doomed, we're all doomed!
                • Jun 2007
                • 11302

                #10717
                Originally posted by Nigey
                Arn had the foresight to see that, was laughed at, and now it's completely feasible.

                Arnish
                Personally I don't think anything can be ruled out though. It's not really a normal thing for a grown person to do, let alone do it twice. It caused his exit from Ajax and it's going to be his last act (more than likely) in a Liverpool shirt too

                Comment

                • Neil Young
                  Prosecco Socialist
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 62564

                  #10718
                  Originally posted by Nigey
                  Arn had the foresight to see that, was laughed at, and now it's completely feasible.

                  Arnish
                  Yes, I noticed Arn said it and thought it was possible then. I still think it's more unlikely than not.

                  It's a neat explanation - Suárez bites him and causes a media firestorm and then blames the media as his justification for wanting a transfer. But it

                  The trouble with the interpretation is not that it doesn't fit the obvious facts but that it doesn't fit less obvious ones (like the fact it happened a split second after a tussle and his foot getting trodden on). So the argument could be, like so many others, based on selective data.

                  And there's also the possibility of coherence bias. The trouble with neat, coherent explanations is the issue of whether reality is all that neat and coherent.
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment

                  • Neil Young
                    Prosecco Socialist
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 62564

                    #10719
                    And that's not Arnish, it's Arnic. Arnish is his strange and sometimes garbled way with words. Arnic is his specific branch of logic where all data proves the predetermined hypothesis (which these days is usually about FSG).
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment

                    • Tee
                      El Pistolero
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 35788

                      #10720
                      I don't think Luis needed to 'create' the bite incident to force a move. Even if he was POTY here and there was no media issues this season he would have wanted to go to Madrid IMO (assuming they declared their interest). Fact is we finished 7th and as many others have pointed out, a move to Madrid or Barca is the dream ticket for South American players.
                      "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                      Comment

                      • Neil Young
                        Prosecco Socialist
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 62564

                        #10721
                        That's another fact that Arn's interpretation misses out.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                        • rodo
                          Shankly
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 9708

                          #10722
                          after torres then suarez....
                          Oh I say his vision there was lovely

                          Comment

                          • fah-q
                            Touching cloth
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 16727

                            #10723
                            Is Burt Bacarach a big liverpool fan?

                            He's more walk on by than walk alone.

                            Comment

                            • DannyMan2006
                              Paisley
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 18368

                              #10724
                              If Suarez had come out and stated that since he's at the peak of his career and we're not in the top 4, with no guarantees that we will be next season, he was leaving, I'd say fair enough.

                              Even though I feel he owes us, to have the worlds biggest and most successful club in for him, from a country where his own language is the native tongue, where he has family living over there and to have possibly a once in a lifetime chance if going....... Who could blame him.

                              But this constant stream of bull**** about press persecution is ridiculous. The vast majority of it, he's brought on himself.

                              Handling on the line in the World Cup v Ghana was his choice, as was biting the PSV and Chelsea players. Diving and play acting was his choice. Winding up Evra, racial or not, was his choice.

                              I know there are players who cheat more (Bale). There are players who have bitten the opposition (Defoe). There are players who have been crazier (Cantona). There have been players who have cheated as much in world cups (Maradona, Rivaldo). There have even been players who have been proved to say racist words (Terry).

                              But Suarez has pretty much done the lot. And that's why he's hated and called a horrible scumbag. And it's all his own doing.
                              Forwards.......

                              Comment

                              • DannyMan2006
                                Paisley
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 18368

                                #10725
                                I must say, I love him as a player. The will to win is the cause of it all, so I can't hate him for it since that's the reason I love him. But when it's spelled out in black and white, I must say, for the clubs image we would be better of without him.

                                For me, pros and cons to him staying and going. So I'll not be gutter either way.
                                Forwards.......

                                Comment

                                Working...