-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
We lost the Heinze case too. As well as Ziege.Thanks very much for beingComment
-
The Heinze one works for me though. He tried to get himself out of his deal to come to us and failed. Utd won. Hopefully the same happens with Suarez and we get to call the shotsComment
-
Three cases then, going back a decade or so. And as Tee says, we won the biggest of the lot.
None of us even know whether the same lawyers are involved - there are certainly some different areas of law - or even the same firms.
It doesn't really matter and we're all free to think what we like about the lawyers the club uses, if we really haven't got better things to think about.
But I doubt the vast majority of us (including me) are qualified or knowledgeable enough to opine on the merits of the club's legal representation just as we don't have a clue about corporate accounting, etc. - although that hasn't stopped people (mis)reading balance sheets and going into tedious and erroneous detail about transfer payments and sponsorship deals and all that.
We may know little about football too but at least we can watch the games and have some idea of what's happening on the pitch.
Well, most of us have, I'm not including Nige obviously..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Well the simple solution is if Pere and Suarez hit us with a legal case then we should roll up with the big dog, Grabbiner. Break both of their's ballsComment
-
Liverpool inserted the clause you'd HOPE they know exactly what it entails and that Suarez and his lawers are a bit thick.Comment
-
If Suarez takes us to court then it's over with regards to keeping him. No way Suarez takes us to court and plays for Liverpool ever again.Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
If we are looking into the legality of various contract issues, we should also make sure that it is investigated as to how Arsenal became aware of this over £40m+ clause in his contract, because something untoward has certainly been going on there.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
Arsenal legal eagles looking at Suarez's release clause according to twitter. Funny how they got access to his contract though.
Should be reported to the FA for tapping-up/illegal approachComment
Comment